Additional Criminal Restitution In The Handling Of General Criminal Cases By The Prosecutor's Office

Authors

  • Rozzyana Nyndhya Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Supardi Supardi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Handoyo Prasetyo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i6.785

Keywords:

Restitution, Criminal subtitute restitution, Attorney

Abstract

The provision of restitution to victims of criminal acts is considered not optimal in its implementation with various problems such as from the regulatory aspect and at the level of implementing relevant stakeholders in the implementation of prosecutions. The results of this study will be presented by describing the data obtained through literature studies analyzed by quantitative methods. The study shows that there is a need for an arrangement that contains a substitute crime if the defendant or convicted person is not able to pay a replacement crime as a norm that becomes the legal basis for public prosecutors and judges in prosecuting and deciding cases. The problem arises due to the lack of comprehensive regulations regarding criminal charges in lieu of the payment of compensation, the non-regulation of criminal substitutes for the payment, and the nonregulation of the amount of the criminal substitute. The ideal arrangement in a criminal prosecution that is carried out comprehensively and correctly by the relevant parties is expected to provide legal certainty, justice, and expediency.

References

Ali, M., Muliyono, A., Sanjaya, W., & Wibowo, A. (2022). Compensation and restitution for victims of crime in indonesia: Regulatory flaws, judicial response, and proposed solution. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2069910

Azzahra, G. A. (2023). Pertimbangan Hakim dan Perlindungan Hukum Korban dalam Putusan Kasus Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Konten Pornografi dengan Motif Pengancaman. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Bawono, B. T. (2021). RESTITUTION RIGHTS AS A CONSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE REFERRING TO THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF WITNESSES AND VICTIMS. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15321

Erwin, R., Angelia, R. R. O., & Desmon, A. (2023). PEMBERIAN RESTITUSI DAN KOMPENSASI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 5(2), 1–8.

Faizah, A. F., & Hariri, M. R. (2022). Pelindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Revenge Porn sebagai Bentuk Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(7), 520–541.

Krisnamurti, H. (2021). Pemenuhan Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Melalui Pemberian Restitusi Menurut Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2007 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 55–68.

Kusyandi, A. (2023). Limits on the Value of Restitution for Victims of Crime A Form of Restorative Justice System. 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice (ICoLGaS 2023). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-164-7_35

Permatasari, G., Sawitri, H. W., & Maryono, A. S. (2019). Pelaksanaan Pemberian Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Indramayu). Soedirman Law Review, 1(1).

Sitompul, R. M., & Maysarah, A. (2021). Initiating Payment of Trafficking Restitution from a Victims Perspective. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i1.18276

Soekotjo, A. R. S. (2022). Kajian Atas Pemenuhan Hak Restutusi terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dan Penganiayaan Berdasarkan Pasal 7A UU Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 (Studi Putusan Nomor 5/PID. SUS-ANAK/2020/PN Sleman).

Suyanto, S. (2016). Penggunaan Metode Arus Uang Masuk Dalam Pemeriksaan Pajak Sebagai Sumber Sengketa Pajak Berdasarkan Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perubahaan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Umum Dan Tatacara. Lex Certa, 1(1), 161–175.

Syahira, S. (2023). TINJAUAN KRIMINOLOGIS TERHADAP KEJAHATAN MELARIKAN PEREMPUAN YANG BELUM DEWASA (Studi Kasus di Kepolisian Resor Kota Besar Makassar Tahun 2020-2022).= A Criminological Review of the crime of Escaping Immature Woman (Case Study at the Makassar City Resort Police in 2020-2022). Universitas Hasanuddin.

Syam, I., Sahari, A., & Zulyadi, R. (2023). Analisis Hukum Pertimbangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Untuk Menentukan Berat Ringannya Tuntutan Terhadap Terdakwa Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Di Kejaksaan Bener Meriah). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 4(2), 100–111.

Waluyo, B. (2011). Viktimologi Perlindungan saksi dan korban. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wardhani, D. W., & Mulyanto, M. (2023). Restitution as a Form of Legal Protection for Child Victims of Sexual Violence with Perpetrators of a Biological Father Based on the Principles of Justice. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 40. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8308

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29