Enhancing E-Government Implementation Through Website Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.766Keywords:
Effectiveness, Village Website, E-GovernmentAbstract
This study explores the effectiveness of village website management in facilitating e-government implementation within Kebarepan Village, Plumbon District, Cirebon Regency. It assesses four key indicators of program effectiveness: program success, target success, satisfaction with the program, and levels of input and output. Employing a qualitative or naturalistic approach, data were collected through literature review and field study, incorporating observations, interviews, and documentation. Analysis indicates that village website management significantly enhances e-government implementation effectiveness, encompassing program success, target success, satisfaction with the program, and levels of input and output. However, certain obstacles hinder the complete realization of effectiveness. This study enhances comprehension of e-government implementation at the village level and provides insights into addressing existing barriers. The implications of these findings can inform policymakers and practitioners in optimizing e-government effectiveness within village settings.
References
Adjei-Bamfo, P., Maloreh-Nyamekye, T., & Ahenkan, A. (2019). The role of e-government in sustainable public procurement in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.001
Afieroho, P., Perkins, R., Zhou, X. (Thomas), Hoanca, B., & Protasel, G. (2023). Adopting e-government to monitor public infrastructure projects execution in Nigeria: The public perspective. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E18552
Awotunde, J. B., Ayo, E. F., Ajamu, G. J., Jimoh, T. B., & Ajagbe, S. A. (2023). The influence of industry 4.0 and 5.0 for distance learning education in times of pandemic for a modern society. In Advances in Distance Learning in Times of Pandemic (pp. 177–214). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Azzahra, A. (2023). Implementation of Good Governance in Public Services at Local Government. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(7), 1899–1906.
Boz, Y., & Cay, T. (2024). How smart and sustainable are the cities in Turkiye? - National policies and the enthusiasm level of the local governments. Heliyon, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E26002
Budi, N. F. A., Fitriani, W. R., Hidayanto, A. N., Kurnia, S., & Inan, D. I. (2020). A study of government 2.0 implementation in Indonesia. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100920
Carrera-Rivera, A., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022). Context-awareness for the design of Smart-product service systems: Literature review. Computers in Industry, 142, 103730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103730
Chen, W., Zhang, H., & Hu, Y. (2024). How local governments balance multiple agendas in small-scale outbreaks responses: A multi-case comparative study from four major cities in China. Cities, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2024.104900
Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Segura-Tinoco, A., Cantador, I., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2023). Trends and challenges of e-government chatbots: Advances in exploring open government data and citizen participation content. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2023.101877
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Higher Ed.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Doucet, T. C., Duinker, P. N., Zurba, M., Steenberg, J. W. N., & Charles, J. D. (2024). Perspectives of successes and challenges in collaborations between non-governmental organization and local government on urban forest management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2024.128220
Fan, B., & Pan, T. (2023). Does information technology–organizational resource interaction affect E-government performance? Moderating roles of environmental uncertainty. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2023.101830
Farida, I., Setiawan, R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Juwita, M. N. (2020). The implementation of E-government in the industrial revolution era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 22(2), 340–346.
Gao, S., Qiao, R., Lim, M. K., Li, C., Qu, Y., & Xia, L. (2021). Integrating corporate website information into qualitative assessment for benchmarking green supply chain management practices for the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127590
Guan, W., Li, Y., Liu, J., Ullah, S., & Metawa, N. (2024). How does digital government affect natural resource sustainability? A global perspective. Resources Policy, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2024.104951
Guo, Y. (2024). Investigating the impact of culture dimensions on Chinese citizens’ continuous use of e-government websites: A cultural model-based study. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104196
Gupta, A., Suri, P. K., & Singh, R. K. (2019). Analyzing the Interaction of Barriers in E-Governance Implementation for Effective Service Quality: Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Business Perspectives and Research, 7(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533718800562
Karunia, R. L., Budiaji, R., Suzana, R., Dewi, K. S., & Prasetyo, J. H. (2023). Analysis of the Factors that Affect the Implementation of E-Government in Indonesia. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 46–54.
Lee, S. M., & Trimi, S. (2021). Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Journal of Business Research, 123, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041
Lee, T. (David), Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, B. K. (2021). A validation of the modified democratic e-governance website evaluation model. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101616
Lee, T., Lee, B. K., & Lee-Geiller, S. (2020). The effects of information literacy on trust in government websites: Evidence from an online experiment. International Journal of Information Management, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2020.102098
Lee-Geiller, S. (2024). Technology married to good governance and diversity: Explaining e-participation preparedness in government. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2024.123218
Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2023). How does e-government use affect citizens’ trust in government? Empirical evidence from China. Information and Management, 60(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2023.103844
Lytras, M. D., & ?erban, A. C. (2020). E-government insights to smart cities research: European union (EU) study and the role of regulations. Ieee Access, 8, 65313–65326.
Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
Palaco, I., Park, M. J., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2019). Public–private partnerships for e-government in developing countries: An early stage assessment framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, 72, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.015
Puron-Cid, G., Luna, D. E., Picazo-Vela, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2022). Improving the assessment of digital services in government websites: Evidence from the Mexican State government portals ranking. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101589
Sarantis, D., Soares, D., & Carvalho, J. (2022). Developing health sector websites assessment instrument: Challenges and pitfalls. Evaluation and Program Planning, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2022.102065
Sharma, H. B., Vanapalli, K. R., Samal, B., Cheela, V. R. S., Dubey, B. K., & Bhattacharya, J. (2021). Circular economy approach in solid waste management system to achieve UN-SDGs: Solutions for post-COVID recovery. Science of The Total Environment, 800, 149605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149605
Sharma, R., Mishra, R., & Mishra, A. (2021). Determinants of satisfaction among social entrepreneurs in e-Government services. International Journal of Information Management, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2021.102386
Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2020). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2017.08.005
Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J. F. F. E., Tejada, Á., & Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2022.101978
Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022). Evaluating -governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2022.102118
Zhang, Y., & Kimathi, F. A. (2022). Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective. Technology in Society, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2022.101942
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Septien Dwi savandha, Adelia Azzahra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
