Effectiveness of Merging Compensation Claims in Criminal Cases: A Case Study of Decision Number 196/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Jkt.Utr.

Authors

  • Lonna Yohanes Lengkong Universitas Kristen Indonesia, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta
  • Tomson Situmeang Universitas Kristen Indonesia, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta
  • Andree Washington Universitas Kristen Indonesia, East Jakarta, DKI Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.743

Keywords:

Code Of Criminal Procedure, Victims Of Crime, Indemnity, Incorporation Of Claims For Damages

Abstract

This study investigates the Efficiency of Combining Compensation Claims in Criminal Cases, focusing on Decision Number 196/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Jkt.Utr. Crime victims' rights are addressed by Law Number 8 of 1981, specifically in Articles 98 to 101 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP), while compensation in Civil Law is governed by Article 1365 of the Civil Code. However, seeking compensation through civil law procedures can be time-consuming. A normative juridical approach was employed, utilizing statutory analysis and a case study method. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials provided secondary data. The analysis, framed by justice theory and legal certainty theory, reveals that merging compensation lawsuits with criminal cases under Article 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code can expedite resolution. Prerequisites for consolidation include alignment of defendant actions with charges, resulting losses, and a request from the aggrieved party to the Judge. This study underscores the potential of combining cases to streamline compensation claims, offering implications for enhancing victims' access to justice within the legal system.

References

Arief, H. (2018). Domestic violence and victim rights in Indonesian law concerning the elimination of domestic violence. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 21, 1.

Ashworth, A. (2019). Victims’ rights, defendants’ rights and criminal procedure. In Integrating a victim perspective within criminal justice (pp. 185–204). Routledge.

Atmadja, I. D. G., & Wirawan, K. A. (2023). Legal Principles in Legal System. International Conference on “Changing of Law: Business Law, Local Wisdom and Tourism Industry”(ICCLB 2023), 583–590.

Bazelon, L., & Green, B. A. (2019). Victims’ Rights from a Restorative Perspective. Ohio St. J. Crim. L., 17, 293.

Burke, R. H. (2018). An introduction to criminological theory. Routledge.

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2020). The Criminal Procedure Code. In Crime and Punishment in Indonesia (pp. 44–69). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

de Miguel Perales, C., & Wilkinson, G. (2024). Criminal Enforcement of Environmental Law in the European Union and the United States. Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00051-8

Demin, A. V. (2020). Certainty and Uncertainty in Tax Law: Do Opposites Attract? Laws, 9(4), 30.

Erwiningsih, W. (2023). Enhancing Legal Certainty in Land Collateral: Bridging Regulatory Gaps, Mitigating Vulnerabilities, and Promoting Credit Access in Indonesia. Croatian International Relations Review, 29(93), 26–49.

Ginsberg, R. (2018). Mighty crime victims: Victims’ rights and neoliberalism in the American conjuncture. In Cultural Studies and the’Juridical Turn’ (pp. 196–231). Routledge.

Iksan, M., Surbakti, N., Kurnianingsih, M., Budiono, A., Al-Fatih, S., & Ramon, T. M. (2023). Fulfilling the restitution rights of crime victims: The legal practice in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(4), 152–160.

Jivebäck Pap, K. (2021). An even application of plausibility? A legal study of the application of the principle of legal certainty to the plausibility threshold in relation to pharmaceutical patents in European patent law.

Lapkin, A., Maryniv, V., Yevtieieva, D., Stolitnii, A., & Borovyk, A. (2019). Compensation for damage caused by offences as the way of protection of victims’ rights (on the example of Ukraine): The economic and legal aspects. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 22, 1.

Lei, L. (2017). Legal Methods, Legal Certainty and the Rule of Law. Renmin Chinese Law Review: Selected Papers of the Jurist, 5.

Maiano, L., Montuschi, A., Caserio, M., Ferri, E., Kieffer, F., Germanò, C., Baiocco, L., Ricciardi Celsi, L., Amerini, I., & Anagnostopoulos, A. (2023). A deep-learning–based antifraud system for car-insurance claims. Expert Systems with Applications, 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2023.120644

Ngulube, P. (2015). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation: systematic search for meaning. Addressing Research Challenges: Making Headway for Developing Researchers, 131, 156.

Nugroho, A. F. (2023). Legal Protection For Victims Of Fair Trial Rights As A Form Of Human Rights Protection In The Indonesian Justice System. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues, 2(1), 1–12.

Santriana, S., Anisah, D., & Kesuma, S. I. (2023). Crime Victims in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Based on The Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP). Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 1(3), 90–98.

Sjarif, K. (2019). The Role of Penal Mediation To Resolve Criminal Acts That Cause Harms To Others In Indonesian Military Court. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 22, 1.

Tryzna, J. (2019). 15 Is the principle of legal certainty a human right? The Philosophy of Legal Change: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Processes, 166.

Ul Akmal, D. (2021). Indonesian State of Law is an Aspired Concept. Nurani Hukum, 4, 77.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18