Power and Law in The Context of Separation of Powers: A Qualitative Study of The Relationship Between The Executive and The Judiciary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i02.737Keywords:
Power, Law, Separation of Powers, Executive, JudicialAbstract
This study aims to delve deeper into the relationship between the executive and the judiciary in the context of separation of powers. Through a qualitative study approach, this study will analyze the dynamics of power and the role of law in influencing the interaction between the two branches of government. The research will involve in-depth interviews with legal practitioners, judges, executive officers, and other relevant stakeholders to gather in-depth qualitative data. Data analysis will be carried out by taking into account theoretical perspectives and concepts related to separation of powers, political power, judicial independence, and the role of law in the government system. The results of this study conclude that a better understanding of the dynamics of power and law in the relationship between the executive and the judiciary provides valuable insights for policymakers and law enforcers in strengthening the separation of powers and improving equitable governance systems.
References
Ali, Yusuf Faisal. (2017). Distribusi Kekuasaan Politik Dalam Kajian Fiqh Siyâsah. Untirta Civic Education Journal, 2(2).
Badaruddin, Sukri, Supriadi, Supriadi, & Ramadhani, Syaila Indah. (2022). Dinamika Kelembagaan Negara Berdasarkan Pascaamandemen Uud Nri Tahun 1945. Qisthosia: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 3(1), 37–47.
Basuki, Udiyo. (2011). Struktur Ketatanegaraan: Analisis Yuridis atas Dinamika Lembaga-lembaga Negara Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 1(1).
Berlinger, Edina, Gramlich, Dieter, Walker, Thomas, & Zhao, Yunfei. (2024). Governmental responses and firm resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of culture and politics. Economic Systems, 101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSYS.2024.101196
Bintari, Aninditya Eka. (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Negative Legislator dalam Penegakan Hukum Tata Negara. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 8(1).
Böhringer, Eileen, & Boucher, Charlotte. (2024). Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers. Electoral Studies, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2023.102714
Bustamin, Bustamin, & Jaya, Rony. (2019). Urgensi Checks And Balances Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dan Islam. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 18(2), 221–232.
Cao, Guangyu, Liu, Chenran, & Zhou, Li An. (2023). Suing the government under weak rule of law: Evidence from administrative litigation reform in China. Journal of Public Economics, 222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2023.104895
Chemin, Matthieu. (2021). Can judiciaries constrain executive power? Evidence from judicial reforms. Journal of Public Economics, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2021.104428
Dahal, Girdhari. (2024). Nepal’s experience in implementing the federal government system: Assessment of law-making by the local governments of Kaski district, Nepal. Heliyon, 10(4), e26250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E26250
Handini, Wulan Pri. (2019). Problematika Kedudukan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) Diantara Kekuasaan Legislatif Dan Ekesekutif. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 49(1), 117–149.
Hidayat, Rahmad. (2022). Pentingnya Pengelolaan Manajemen Keuangan Pada Sekolah. Teknologi Pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Quantitative: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif . PT. Rosdakarya Teens. DOI: Https://Doi. Org/10.31004/Basicedu. V6i4, 3090.
Nguenda Anya, Saturnin Bertrand, & Nzepang, Fabrice. (2022). The role of the separation of democratic powers on structural transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Systems, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSYS.2022.101021
Nuraini, Nuraini, & Ansori, Mhd. (2022). Politik Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Wajah Hukum, 6(2), 426–433.
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., & Weinbaum, Rebecca K. (2017). A framework for Using qualitative comparative analysis for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 22(2), 359–372.
Permana, Rangga Saptya Mohamad, & Mahameruaji, Jimi Narotama. (2020). Perbandingan Konsep-konsep Triumvirate Sunda dengan Trias Politica dalam Perspektif Komunikasi Politik. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 4(1), 17–33.
Petz, Cindarella, & Pfeffer, Jürgen. (2021). Configuration to conviction: Network structures of political judiciary in the Austrian Corporate State. Social Networks, 66, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCNET.2021.03.001
Rompas, Michael Brayn. (2013). Kekuasaan Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, 1(3).
Safriani, Andi. (2017). Telaah terhadap Hubungan Hukum dan kekuasaan. Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(2), 37–45.
Subarkah, Ibnu, Nurjaya, I. Nyoman, & Sugiri, Bambang. (2021). Arah Campur Tangan Urusan Peradilan Pasal 3 Ayat (2) UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(2), 862–878.
Susanto, Sri Nur Hari. (2014). Pergeseran Kekuasaan Lembaga Negara Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 43(2), 279–288.
Zeng, James Si. (2023). Competing with Leviathan: Law and government ownership in China’s public-private partnership market. International Review of Law and Economics, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRLE.2023.106166
Zuhro, R. Siti. (2018). Demokrasi, otonomi daerah dan pemerintahan indonesia. Interaktif: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 1–41.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dede Amirudin, Christian, Samsudin Nurseha, Abdul Musyfiq Al-aytami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
