Portrait of the Politicization of Indonesian Bureaucracy in the 2024 Election
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.735Keywords:
Politicization, Indonesian Bureaucracy, ElectionAbstract
This study delves into the intricate relationship between the state and government, with a specific focus on bureaucracy as a pivotal component of government policy. Against the backdrop of political science, the article investigates the politicization of bureaucracy during the 2024 elections in Indonesia. By tracing the historical trajectory of bureaucratic politicization from the New Order to Reformasi, the research sheds light on the evolution of this phenomenon. Emphasizing bureaucratic neutrality as a cornerstone of good governance, the study employs a qualitative-critical descriptive approach through literature reviews. Qualitative data, derived from expert statements and scientific perspectives, undergoes rigorous analysis using discourse and content analysis methods. The historical analysis exposes the enduring link between bureaucracy and politics, notably during the New Order era, characterized by Golkar's absolute dominance. Despite post-1998 bureaucratic reforms, the persistent challenge of bureaucratic politicization looms large, especially in anticipation of the 2024 elections. The research underscores that achieving bureaucratic neutrality encounters obstacles rooted in the political system and socio-political conditions. Conceptual and theoretical discussions, though robust, falter in implementation. Effectuating bureaucratic neutrality mandates stringent adherence to rules, commitment from all bureaucracies, and robust supervision and law enforcement. The imperative for bureaucratic neutrality in the 2024 elections necessitates comprehensive socialization across bureaucracies and active stakeholder engagement, particularly from political parties. Fostering awareness of bureaucratic integrity and neutrality is indispensable for upholding public service duties and advancing the principles of good governance in Indonesia.
References
Adam, E. (2019). Constitutional Praxis, Good Governance and Democracy in Nigeria as a Model Cornerstone for National Development in Africa. Good Governance and Democracy in Nigeria as a Model Cornerstone for National Development in Africa (October 30, 2019).
Al-Hassan, O. (2004). Politicized soldiers: Military intervention in the politics of Ghana, 1966–1993. Washington State University.
Anderson, B. R. O. (2006). Language and power: Exploring political cultures in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Antlov, H., & Cederroth, S. (2014). Leadership on Java: Gentle hints, authoritarian rule. Routledge.
Atmojo, M. E., Sulaksono, T., Hanif, N. A., & Fridayani, H. D. (2023). The Problem of Neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in the 2020 Regional Head Election. ARISTO, 11(2), 220–237.
Azzahra, A. (2023). Implementation Of Good Governance in Public Services at Local Government. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(7), 1899–1906. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i7.594
Bach, T. (2021). Bureaucracies and Policy Ideas. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Bourchier, D., & Hadiz, V. (2014). Indonesian politics and society: A reader. Routledge.
Cole, A. (2006). Rightist parties in Europe: new politics, new right, new party? University of California, Irvine.
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Higher Ed.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Crouch, H. A. (2007). The army and politics in Indonesia. Equinox Publishing.
Ellis, A. (2007). Indonesia’s constitutional change reviewed’. Indonesia: Democracy and the Promise of Good Governance, Singapore: ISEAS, 21–40.
Galvin, D. (2006). Presidential Party Building in the United States. Unpublished Dissertation, Yale University.
Goss, A. (2009). The Idea of Indonesia: A History. History: Reviews of New Books, 37(2), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03612759.2009.10527319
Hartatik, E. S. (2022). The Transformation of the Javanese Patrimonial-feudalistic Bureaucracy from the Traditional Kingdom to the Dutch Colonial Period. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 49(2), 60–72.
Herbst, J. I. (2008). The politics of reform in Ghana, 1982-1991. Univ of California Press.
Hussain, A. A. (2001). Pengantar pentadbiran awam: paradigma baru. (No Title).
Jacob, S. (2008). Internal party politics and development in India. (No Title).
Laski, H. (2017). The state in theory and practice. Routledge.
Lederer, M., & Höhne, C. (2021). Max Weber in the tropics: How global climate politics facilitates the bureaucratization of forestry in Indonesia. Regulation & Governance, 15(1), 133–151.
Lewis, D. E. (2004). Presidents and the politics of agency design: Political insulation in the United States government bureaucracy, 1946-1997. Stanford University Press.
Lindsey, T. (2012). Monopolising Islam: The Indonesian Ulama Council and state regulation of the ‘Islamic economy.’ Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 48(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2012.694157
Mizgala, J. J. (2007). The emergence and development of the party system in Spain 1997-2005.
Nadjib, A., Bafadhal, O. M., & Santoso, A. D. (2022). Social Capital, Bureaucratic Neutrality, and Regional Head Election in Indonesia. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 1 (87), 37–50.
Ngulube, P. (2015). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation: systematic search for meaning. Addressing Research Challenges: Making Headway for Developing Researchers, 131, 156.
Noer, H. H. (2014). Ketidaknetralan Birokrasi Indonesia: Studi Zaman Orde Baru Sampai Orde Reformasi. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
O’Rourke, K. (2002). Reformasi: the struggle for power in post-Soeharto Indonesia. (No Title).
Orriols, L., & Cordero, G. (2016). The Breakdown of the Spanish Two-Party System: The Upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 General Election. South European Society and Politics, 21(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1198454
Pramusinto, B. (2023). Character Education Efforts in Anticipation of the McDonaldization Phenomenon. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 2(1), 67–75.
Prasojo, E. (2020). Memimpin reformasi birokrasi: kompleksitas dan dinamika perubahan birokrasi Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Randall, V. (2005). The Congress Party of India: Dominance with Competition. Political Parties in the Third World. New Delhi: Sage, 75–97.
Rasyid, M. R. (1994). State formation, party system, and the prospect for democracy in Indonesia: The case of Golongan Karya (1967-1993). University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Ricklefs, M. C. (2001). A History of Modern Indonesia since c. 1200. MacMillan London.
Ryu, S., & Virindra, N. (2023). Impaired Neutrality: A Propensity That Occurs Among Indonesian Bureaucrats in the Election. Policy & Governance Review, 7(1), 38–53.
Serrano, M. (2007). Governing Mexico: political parties and elections. (No Title).
Thoha, M. (2003). Birokrasi dan politik di Indonesia.
Van Klinken, G., & Barker, J. (2018). State of authority: state in society in Indonesia (Issue 50). Cornell University Press.
Yonish, S. J. (2007). Who Parties?: Grassroots Party Activity in the United States 1974-1994. University of Wisconsin--Madison.
Zainuddin, R. E., Mirdad, J., & Yaacob, S. E. (2022). SIy?Sah Shar’Iyyah and the Politicization of Religion in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(2), 357–384.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hamka Hendra Noer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
