Settlement of Traffic Accident Crimes through the Principle of Restorative Justice in the Sorong City Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i12.621Keywords:
Traffic Accident Crimes, Restorative Justice, Customary InstitutionsAbstract
This study focuses on the first problem of solving traffic accident criminal cases that have been applied in law enforcement and how to reconstruct the ideal traffic accident crime resolution based on a restorative justice approach. The method used in this study is normative juridical research with a research approach in the form of a normative approach. The result of this study is that direct involvement between perpetrators, victims, and communities in solving criminal cases is emphasized in the restorative justice approach. Criminal acts involving traffic accidents can be resolved in accordance with the principles of restorative justice. Because it serves the interests of victims and perpetrators based on two perspectives (victims and perpetrators) in terms of accident crimes, the use of restorative justice is essential. The application of restorative justice in solving criminal cases that prioritizes the interests of victims and perpetrators in finding solutions to crimes and their consequences has been outlined in a circular issued by the Indonesian National Police. The traditional dynamic between local communities and their governments in fighting crime can be changed by the use of restorative justice in cases involving accidents. Customary institutions are still often used in Sorong City by local communities to resolve conflicts, but Law No. 22/2009 on Traffic and Road Transport has stipulated the threat of criminal penalties for those responsible for traffic accidents. Therefore, the police had to investigate the traffic accident even if the victim's family decided not to prosecute.
References
Ahmad M, Zainol A, Darus NM, Marzuki Z, Baharom F. 2011. A conceptual framework of tacit knowledge transfer for problem based learning teaching method in system analysis and design course. Di dalam: 2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems. IEEE. hlm. 42–46.
April K, Schrader SW, Walker TE, Francis RM, Glynn H, Gordon DM. 2023. Conceptualizing juvenile justice reform: Integrating the public health, social ecological, and restorative justice models. Child Youth Serv Rev. 148.doi:10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2023.106887.
Arief BN. 2011. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana:(Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru).
van Barligen M. 2015. Interim Evaluation Restorative Mediation.
Chand A, Jayesh S, Bhasi AB. 2021. Road traffic accidents: An overview of data sources, analysis techniques and contributing factors. Mater Today Proc. 47:5135–5141.doi:10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.05.415.
Gerson JC. 2022. Restorative Justice and Alternative Systems. Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict: Volume 1-4, Third Edition. 4:125–136.doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-820195-4.00161-8.
Hairuddin A. 2016. LEGALITAS PENYIDIK POLRI PADA PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS. LEX ET SOCIETATIS. 4(6).doi:10.35796/les.v4i6.12537.
Hobson J, Payne B. 2022. Building restorative justice services: Considerations on top-down and bottom-up approaches. Int J Law Crime Justice. 71.doi:10.1016/J.IJLCJ.2022.100555.
Hotmaulana Hutauruk R. 2013. Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hulsman LHC. 1998. Selamat Tinggal Hukum Pidana Menuju Swa Regulasi, diterjemahkan oleh Wonosusanto. Di dalam: Forum (Surakarta: Studi Hukum Pidana).
Kirkwood S. 2022. A practice framework for restorative justice. Aggress Violent Behav. 63.doi:10.1016/J.AVB.2021.101688.
Krehic L. 2023. Safety first? The effect of studded tyres on traffic accidents and local air pollution. J Environ Econ Manage. 121.doi:10.1016/J.JEEM.2023.102851.
Lee Y. 2023. Finding trace evidence through scope reduction and applying its straightforwardness in traffic accident investigation. Forensic Science International: Reports. 7.doi:10.1016/J.FSIR.2023.100315.
Liebmann M. 2007. Restorative justice: How it works. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Manan B, Abdurahman A, Susanto M. 2021. Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Yang Religius: Konsepsi Dan Tantangan Dalam Negara Berdasarkan Pancasila. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum. 5(2):176–195.doi:10.23920/jbmh.v5i2.303.
Marder ID. 2022. Mapping restorative justice and restorative practices in criminal justice in the Republic of Ireland. Int J Law Crime Justice. 70:100544.doi:10.1016/J.IJLCJ.2022.100544.
Marshall TF. 1996. The evolution of restorative justice in Britain. Eur. J. on Crim. Pol’y & Rsch. 4:21.
Mohammad T, Gearhart MC. 2021. “The law is the law”: The Malaysian police readiness for the implementation of restorative policing. Int J Law Crime Justice. 67.doi:10.1016/J.IJLCJ.2021.100505.
Molovcáková N, Adamová V, Šoltés V. 2021. Analysis of Traffic Accidents in Selected Period in the Žilina Region and proposal of Security Measures. Transportation Research Procedia. 55:1585–1592.doi:10.1016/J.TRPRO.2021.07.147.
Muladi A, Sutrisni ST, Lestari S, Suminar S. 2023. Tingkat Keamanan Lingkungan Terhadap Risiko Jatuh pada Lansia Di Panti Werdha Dharma Bhakti Surakarta. Khatulistiwa Nursing Journal. 5(1):18–25.doi:10.53399/knj.v5i1.204.
Prayitno K. 2012. restorative justice untuk peradilan di Indonesia (perspektif yuridis filosofis dalam penegakan hukum In concreto). Jurnal dinamika hukum. 12(3):407–420.doi:10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.116.
Primasari L. 2007. MODEL PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (STUDI KASUS DI KEPOLISIAN DAERAH JAWA TENGAH). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum. 3(2).doi:10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11092.
Rajasekaran RB, Rajasekaran S, Vaishya R. 2021. The role of social advocacy in reducing road traffic accidents in India. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 12(1):2–3.doi:10.1016/J.JCOT.2020.12.021.
Rona M, Safa’at R, Madjid A, Fadli M. 2020. Restorative Justice In The Settlement Of Traffic Accident Causing Death Toll According To The Perspective Of Customary Judiciary In Sanggau District, West Kalimantan. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum. 9(1):139–151.doi:10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.39351.
Semekto A. 2006. Kajian Hukum Antara Studi Normatif dan Keilmuan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif. 2(2):66.
Soekanto S. 1984. Inventarisasi dan analisa terhadap perundang-undangan lalu lintas.
Sutrisno E. 2007. Bunga rampai hukum & globalisasi. Genta Press.
Utomo W, Isnaini H, Suhartono S, Isnaeni M. 2019. The Position of Honorary Council of Notary in Coaching Indonesian Notaries. JL Pol’y & Globalization. 92:126.
Yang C, Jiang J, Zhou J, Hitosug M, Wang Z. 2023. Traffic safety and public health in China – Past knowledge, current status, and future directions. Accid Anal Prev. 192.doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2023.107272.
Yarn DH. 2023. Evolution and dueling dispute processing. Evolution and Human Behavior. 44(3):272–277.doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.02.007.
Yuliana S. 2020. Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Oleh Anak-Anak Di Bawah Umur Di Desa Simpang Rimba Kabupaten Bangka Selatan. Justici. 12(2):44–54.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ryo Thunder Triatmoko, Ramlani Lina Sinaulan, Yuhelson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
