Implementation Implications Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture on Notaries Whose Authentic Deeds Are Indicated as Means of Money Laundering


  • Ni Wayan Gita Pratisthita Master of Notary Affairs, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia
  • Pieter E. Latumeten Master of Notary Affairs, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia



Notary, Money Laundering, Asset Confiscation


Money laundering, which arises from illicit activities, typically requires a legitimate document to facilitate the transfer of funds into an asset. Notaries, authorized public officials capable of creating such legitimate documents, may be implicated in money laundering offenses. In the ongoing efforts to combat money laundering, there is an increasing emphasis on asset confiscation without the need for criminal convictions (Non-Conviction Asset Forfeiture), as exemplified in the Draft Law on Asset Confiscation. This study aims to evaluate the concept of Non-Conviction Asset Forfeiture, explore the role of Notaries in preventing money laundering activities, and scrutinize the implications of implementing Non-Conviction Asset Forfeiture on Notaries who authentically notarize documents that may be used for money laundering. The research employs a normative juridical approach focusing on theoretical and statutory considerations. It elucidates the core principles of Non-Conviction Asset Forfeiture, specifically the pursuit of assets derived from criminal activities when the perpetrator cannot be held accountable due to circumstances. Furthermore, the research underscores that Notaries who authenticate documents suspected of facilitating money laundering may face legal consequences, potentially including the confiscation of their assets if they violate relevant laws and regulations.


Abd Rashid, S., Masron, T. A., & Malim, N. A. K. (2023). The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in the presence of weak regulatory quality: Evidence from developing countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86.

Afzali, M., ?olak, G., & Fu, M. (2021). Economic uncertainty and corruption: Evidence from public and private firms. Journal of Financial Stability, 57.

Akartuna, E. A., Johnson, S. D., & Thornton, A. (2022). Preventing the money laundering and terrorist financing risks of emerging technologies: An international policy Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179.

Anima, M. T., Nath, N. C., & Dalia, S. Das. (2023). Impact of Informal Remittance Channels in Bangladesh: Understanding the Role of Hundi in Financial Crime beyond Economic Aspects. Journal of Economic Criminology, 100030.

Aparicio, K., & Kim, R. (2023). External capital market frictions, corporate governance, and tax avoidance: Evidence from the TED spread. Finance Research Letters, 52, 103381.

Athira, A., & Ramesh, V. K. (2023). COVID-19 and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. International Business Review, 32(4).

Badaruddin, K. A. (2018). Tipologi Pencucian Uang Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Pencucian Uang Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan.

Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Topaloglu, E. E., Nur, T., & Evcimen, C. (2023). Exploring the linkage between financial development and ecological footprint in APEC countries: A novel view under corruption perception and environmental policy stringency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414.

Bolgorian, M., Mayeli, A., & Ronizi, N. G. (2023). CEO compensation and money laundering risk. Journal of Economic Criminology, 1, 100007.

Çemberci, M., Ba?ar, D., & Yurtsever, Z. (2022). The effect of institutionalization level on the relationship of corporate governance with money laundering activity: An example of the BIST Corporate Governance Index. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(5), 1020–1032.

Dak-Adzaklo, C. S. P., & Wong, R. M. K. (2023). Corporate governance reforms, societal trust, and corporate financial policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 102507.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wei, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Does public corruption affect analyst forecast quality? Journal of Banking and Finance, 154.

Fhima, F., Nouira, R., & Sekkat, K. (2023). How does corruption affect sustainable development? A threshold non-linear analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 505–523.

Firmansyah, A., Arham, A., Qadri, R. A., Wibowo, P., Irawan, F., Kustiani, N. A., Wijaya, S., Andriani, A. F., Arfiansyah, Z., Kurniawati, L., Mabrur, A., Dinarjito, A., Kusumawati, R., & Mahrus, M. L. (2022). Political connections, investment opportunity sets, tax avoidance: does corporate social responsibility disclosure in Indonesia have a role? Heliyon, 8(8), e10155.

Gani, A. (2021). Sustainability of energy assets and corruption in the developing countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 741–751.

Garnasih, Y. (2010). Asset Recovery Act sebagai strategi dalam pengembalian aset hasil korupsi, dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 7(4).

Gowin, K. D., Wang, D., Jory, S. R., Houmes, R., & Ngo, T. (2021). Impact on the firm value of financial institutions from penalties for violating anti-money laundering and economic sanctions regulations. Finance Research Letters, 40.

Hermawan, S., Karim, M. F., & Rethel, L. (2023). Institutional layering in climate policy: Insights from REDD+ governance in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 154.

Kirimhan, D. (2023). Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance. Journal of Business Research, 157.

Konovalova, M., Tuck, P., & Ormeño Pérez, R. (2023a). In search of the owner: Regulating through transparency. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 91.

Konovalova, M., Tuck, P., & Ormeño Pérez, R. (2023b). In search of the owner: Regulating through transparency. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 91.

Kuvvet, E. (2021). Anti-corruption courts and foreign direct investments. International Review of Economics and Finance, 72, 573–582.

Kuzior, A., Vasylieva, T., Kuzmenko, O., Koibichuk, V., & Bro?ek, P. (2022). Global Digital Convergence: Impact of Cybersecurity, Business Transparency, Economic Transformation, and AML Efficiency. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4).

Laajaj, R., Eslava, M., & Kinda, T. (2023). The costs of bureaucracy and corruption at customs: Evidence from the computerization of imports in Colombia. Journal of Public Economics, 225.

Lasmadi, S., & Sudarti, E. (2021). Pembuktian Terbalik Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. REFLEKSI HUKUM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 199–2018.

Mulyadi, L. (2020). Model ideal aset (asset recovery): pelaku tindak pidana korupsi.

Nelson, F. M. (2020). Sistem peradilan pidana dan penanggulangan korupsi di Indonesia. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Nguyen, H. Q. (2023). Corruption, political connection, and firm investments. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90.

Nguyen, M. L. T., & Bui, N. T. (2022). Government expenditure and economic growth: does the role of corruption control matter? Heliyon, 8(10).

Saha, S., & Sen, K. (2023). Do economic and political crises lead to corruption? The role of institutions. Economic Modelling, 124.

Sasmita, R. P. R., Suseno, S., & Jaya, P. Y. (2023). The concept of reasons for eliminating corporate crime in criminal law in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(11).

Setyowati, M. S., Utami, N. D., Saragih, A. H., & Hendrawan, A. (2023). Strategic factors in implementing blockchain technology in Indonesia’s value-added tax system. Technology in Society, 72.

Shen, Y., Sharkey, T. C., Szymanski, B. K., & Wallace, W. (Al). (2021). Interdicting interdependent contraband smuggling, money and money laundering networks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78.

Suh, J. (2023). Human Rights and Corruption in Settling the Accounts of the Past: Transitional Justice Experiences from the Philippines, South Korea, and Indonesia. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 179(1), 61–89.

Susilawati, D., & Kanowski, P. J. (2022). Improving Indonesia’s timber legality and sustainability verification system: Proposals based on case studies of natural forest-, corporate tree plantation- and smallholder-based value chains. Environmental Science and Policy, 137, 384–395.

Syamsuddin, A. (2022). Proses Dan Teknik Penyusunan Undang-Undang (Edisi Kedua). Sinar Grafika.

Szczepaniak, M., Geise, A., & Bariyah, N. (2022). Impact of institutional determinants on income inequalities in Indonesia during the Era Reformasi. Journal of Asian Economics, 82.

Teichmann, F., Boticiu, S., & Sergi, B. S. (2023a). The risk of abuse of arbitration proceedings in jurisdictions where corruption is pervasive. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, 100032.

Teichmann, F., Boticiu, S., & Sergi, B. S. (2023b). The risk of abuse of arbitration proceedings in jurisdictions where corruption is pervasive. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, 100032.

Varvarigos, D. (2023). Cultural persistence in corruption, economic growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 147.

Wahyono, H., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2022). Structural model of the application of anti-corruption values to local government bureaucrats. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 6(1).

Xiong, A., Liu, G., Zhu, Q., Jing, A., & Loke, S. W. (2022). A notary group-based cross-chain mechanism. Digital Communications and Networks, 8(6), 1059–1067.