The Influence Of The Management System And Teacher Performance On The Quality Of Learning At MTs Bilingual Muslimat NU Pucang Sidoarjo

Authors

  • M. Khusni Mubarok Islamic Education Management, IAI Al- Khoziny Buduran Sidoarjo
  • Zakiatur Rofiah Islamic Education Management, IAI Al- Khoziny Buduran Sidoarjo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i10.573

Keywords:

Influence, Management System, Teacher Performance, Quality of Learning, MTs

Abstract

School as institution formal, informal and non-formal education requires good management  for ensure effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process in order to achieve objective education. Teacher, as factor main in the learning process teach, play role key in reach quality more education  good. Quality Education is very dependent on teacher performance, and quality teachers are needed For fulfil demands society. A number draft management explain management as tools, energy, systems, processes, tasks and efforts used For reach objective organization. Function management involve planning, organization, guidance, coordination, supervision, and communication. Performance, on the other hand, involves achievement, ability work, and the results that have been achieved achieved. Teacher performance is very important in reach quality more education  good. Therefore  that, researchthis entitled " Influence System Management and Teacher Performance Quality Learning at MTs Bilingual Muslimat NU Pucang Sidoarjo " for explore impact system management and teacher performance towards quality learning at school that.

References

Arikunto S. 1998. Pendekatan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Brown M. 1960. Effective work management. (No Title).

Canales A, Maldonado L. 2018. Teacher quality and student achievement in Chile: Linking teachers’ contribution and observable characteristics. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 60:33–50.doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.09.009.

Elfrida D, Santosa H, Soefijanto TA. 2020. Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru dan Implementasi Kurikulum Asing Terhadap Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Internasional Jakarta Utara. Tadbir J. Stud. Manaj. Pendidik. 4(1):53.doi:10.29240/jsmp.v4i1.1358.

Gore J, Lloyd A, Smith M, Bowe J, Ellis H, Lubans D. 2017. Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teach. Teach. Educ. 68:99–113.doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.007.

Graham LJ, White SLJ, Cologon K, Pianta RC. 2020. Do teachers’ years of experience make a difference in the quality of teaching? Teach. Teach. Educ. 96:103190.doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103190.

Gutkin TB, Hickman JA. 1990. The relationship of consultant, consultee, and organizational characteristics to consultee resistance to school-based consultation: An empirical analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. Consult. 1(2):111–122.doi:10.1207/s1532768xjepc0102_1.

Hamidaton U, Lee MS, Ismail A, Shahida N, Sanusi A. 2018. Ethical climate as a determinant of organizational commitment. Int. J. Asian Soc. Sci. 8(8):534–539.

Husaini U, Akbar PS. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial, Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Klassen RM, Tze VMC. 2014. Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 12:59–76.doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001.

Lundgren EF. 1974. Organizational management: systems and process. (No Title).

Martínez-Zarzuelo A, Rodríguez-Mantilla JM, Fernández-Díaz MJ. 2022. Improvements in climate and satisfaction after implementing a quality management system in education. Eval. Program Plann. 94:102119.doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102119.

Morris SA, Vaughan Jr ED, Constable WC. 1976. Problems in management of primary bilateral germ cell testicular tumors: report of 3 cases and review of literature. J. Urol. 115(5):566–568.doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59285-X.

Musselman VA, Hughes EH. 1969. Introduction to modern business: Analysis and interpretation. (No Title).

Negeri AFMT. The school heads’ strategy for planning to boost the standard of education. .doi:10.29210/021004jpgi0005.

Prawirosentono S, Primasari D. 2022. Manajemen Stratejik & Pengambilan Keputusan Korporasi (Strategic Management & Corporate Decision Making). Bumi Aksara.

Premeaux SR, Gordon JR, Mondy RW, Sharplin A. 1991. Management and Organizational Behaviour. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois.

Ray M, Stoner AW. 1994. Experimental analysis of growth and survivorship in a marine gastropod aggregation: balancing growth with safety in numbers. Mar. Ecol. Ser. 105:47.

Stanton JM. 1998. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Pers. Psychol. 51(3):709–725.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00259.x.

Sumantri Nawawi E. 1988. Citizenship training for steady national development: a case study of the P-4 training program for the students of higher education in West Java, Indonesia.

Surakhmad W. 1982. A. Metode Penelitian.

Swasto B. 1996. Pengembangan Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia pengaruhnya terhadap kinerja dan Imbalan. Malang FIA UB.

Tabata Y, Griek L. 1999. Ensuring Opportunities for the Professional Development of Teachers. Innovation and Reform in Teacher Education for the 21st Century in the Asia-Pacific Region.

Seminar Report (Hiroshima, Japan, September 1998).

Tahalele JF, Indrafachrudi S. 1975. Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Malang Sub Proy. Penulisan Buku Pelajaran P3T IKIP Malang.

Ukas M. 2004. Manajemen: Konsep, Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Agnini.

Wallace DP, Van Fleet C, Downs LJ. 2011. The research core of the knowledge management literature. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 31(1):14–20.doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.002.

Wei H-C, Peng H, Chou C. 2015. Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Comput. Educ. 83:10–21.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-25