Factors Affecting Schools’ Acceptance of Platform SIPLah Implementation Using UTAUT Modified Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i8.502Keywords:
Financial perspective, customer perspective, internal business process perspective Learning and growth perspective, Private Higher Education PerformanceAbstract
SIPLah is an inventive process for purchasing goods and services in educational institutions. It facilitates the reporting process by providing online marketplace partners, non-cash electronic payments, and digitization of documents. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of SIPLah adoption on the quality of good government governance and identify the factors influencing educational institutions in adopting SIPLah. The study was conducted with 210 respondents, who are school principals or officially appointed individuals responsible for procuring goods/services. Questionnaires were distributed online, and data were analyzed using Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results show that Use Behavior in SIPLah adoption significantly influences good government governance. Performa expectancy, effort expectancy, and perceived service quality significantly influence attitude towards SIPLah adoption and usage. Conversely, social influence, facilitating condition, Trust in application, and perceived risk do not significantly affect attitude in adopting SIPLah.
References
Arifudin, O. (2020). Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Era Revolusi 4.0 Dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perguruan Tinggi Nasional. Jurnal Al-Amar (Ekonomi Syariah, Perbankan Syariah, Agama Islam, Manajemen Dan Pendidikan), 1(2), 1–8. Google Scholar
Balanis, C. A. (2005). Antenna theory analysis and design, A John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Publication, 811. Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152–158. Scopus
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ad.). Boston, MA. Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. (2000). Organisasi, Perilaku, Struktur dan Proses, Edisi ke-5, Cetakan ke-3. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Balanced Scorecard, Menerjemahkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi, Alih Bahasa: Peter R. Yosi Pasla. Google Scholar
Lin, M.-H., Hu, J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lin, C. (2016). Sustainable development in technological and vocational higher education: Balanced scorecard measures with uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 1–12. Scopus
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Google Scholar
Peraturan Pemerintah. Peraturan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Nomor 3 tahun 2019 tentang Instrumen Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi. , (2019).
UU. Undang-Undang RI No 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. , (2012).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dini Anggraeni, Anna Fariyanti, Eko Ruddy Cahyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
