Satisfaction of Livable House Assistance Recipients with the Implementation of the Self-Help Housing Stimulant Assistance Program

Wahana Riyan Atmaja; Sihtasari Devi; Ferry Hermawan; Sriyana Sriyana

doi:10.46799/ijssr.v3i6.408

Authors

Wahana Riyan Atmaja Departement of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Sihtasari Devi Departement of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Ferry Hermawan Departement of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Sriyana Sriyana Departement of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i6.408

Keywords:

building quality, program beneficiary satisfaction, housing quality

Abstract

The house is one of the primary needs that must be met by Indonesian people who do not meet livable standards. One of the efforts to be carried out in the infrastructure section, aims so that people get a decent place to live. To realize having a livable house must be planned and prepared properly. This research is reviewed from the problem of many houses that do not yet have decent housing standards. The Government's Self-Help Housing Stimulant Assistance (BSPS) is intended to encourage and increase the self-sufficiency of low-income people in improving the quality of their homes, as seen from the quality of roofs, floors and walls of the house along with infrastructure, public facilities and facilities that meet health, safety, comfort requirements. and bathroom facilities. In the BSPS program as an alternative to poverty alleviation policies by providing direct material assistance for the housing construction process. Based on the intent of the BSPS program objectives according to the BSPS program implementation team in Indonesia, especially in Rembang Regency, the aim of the BSPS program is to improve the quality of life of low-income people to obtain livable housing. that most people respond well to the BSPS program in Japrejo Village and Sumberejo Village Recipients of the Self-Help Housing Stimulant Assistance Program (BSPS), however, it is not uncommon for people to refuse due to limited funds which are considered insufficient. Satisfaction of building recipients after receiving assistance from Self-Help Housing Stimulant Assistance (BSPS) in obtaining assistance. Construction/improvement of houses for low-income people to ensure their quality meets the livable requirements of the BSPS program where assessment is carried out in the Structural and Non-Structural sections according to the house criteria livable

References

Akbari, P., Arsitektur, S., & Sains, U. (2021). Jurnal Teknik Bangunan Perumahan dan kesehatan mental selama wabah COVID-19. 43(2001).

Anita, J. (2021). Perkembangan Kebijakan Publik dan Program Bidang Perumahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Arsitektur Terracotta | No.1 |, 3(1), 12–24.

Astuti, W., & Prasetyo, D. A. (2014). Model of Community-based Housing Development (CBHD) of Bedah Kampung Program in Surakarta Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 593–601.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2021).

Bagus, I., Kemenuh, A. M., & Wenagama, W. (n.d.). Efektivitas Dan Dampak Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri Perdesaan (Pnpm) Terhadap Pendapatan Keluarga Kk Miskin.

Bodgan&Tailor. (2013). Fenomena tersebut dilihat sebagai bagian dari suatu keseluruhan proses.

BPS. (2021). Data Indikator Perumahan 1993-2021. 2(1).

BPS. (2022). DATA BPS. 2(1).

Cao, Y., Li, F., Xi, X., van Bilsen, D. J. C., & Xu, L. (2021). Urban livability: Agent-based simulation, assessment, and interpretation for the case of Futian District, Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320(88).

Elsawy, A. A., Ayad, H. M., & Saadallah, D. (2019). Assessing livability of residential streets – Case study: El-Attarin, Alexandria, Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(2), 745–755.

Hanifah, W., & Widyastuti, D. (2016). Penilaian Lingkungan Fisik Permukiman Kumuh.

Hikmawati, E., & Gutomo, T. (2016). Bedah rumah sebagai bentuk pengentasan kemiskinan. Jurnal PKS, 15(2), 131–144.

Ibem, E. O., & Amole, D. (2013). Subjective life satisfaction in public housing in urban areas of Ogun State, Nigeria. Cities, 35, 51–61.

Ismi, A. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Bantuan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni Untuk Masyarakat Miskin di Kecamatan Long Kali. Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(September 2019), 103–112.

Mailasari. (2016). Implementasi Program Bantuan Stimulan Permuahan Swadaya Tahun 2016 (Studi Kasus Kota Pekanbaru). 1–10.

Mambo & Tampi. (2015). Efektivitas Program Bedah Rumah (Study Kasus di Desa Ranoketang Atas Kecamatan Touluaan Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara). Syria Studies, 7(1), 37–72.

Mardhanie, A. B. (2018). Penelitian Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (RTLH) Kabupaten Bulungan Tahun 2017 (Jumlah dan Prioritas Penanganan). Jurnal Kreatif, 5(2), 13–20.

Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 07/PRT/M/2018 Tentang Bantuan Stimulan Perumahan Swadaya. (2018). Tentang Bantuan Stimulan Perumahan Swadaya, 3(2).

Pitoi, C. D., Tampi, J. R. E., & Punuindoong, A. Y. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Hotel Best Western The Lagoon Manado. Productivity, 2(1), 1–5.

Prayogo, D., & Sukim, S. (2021). Determinan Daya Beli Masyarakat Indonesia Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Tahun 2020. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2021(1), 631–640.

Samputra, P. L., & Munandar, A. I. (2019). Korupsi, Indikator Makro Ekonomi, dan IPM terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 12(1), 35–46.

Silvia, D., Balafif, M., & Rahmasari, A. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Daya Beli Masyarakat di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Bharanomics, 2(1), 81–92.

Sulasman, S. (2012). Kajian Kemampuan Membeli Rumah Bagi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah. Pilar.

Winarno, B. (2018). Evaluasi Program Penyediaan Rumah Layak Huni Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Di Kabupaten Belitung. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 6(1), 66.