Cultural Village Management Model to Enhance Cultural Tourism in The Special Region of Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i5.376Keywords:
Cultural Village, Management, Cultural Tourism DevelopmentAbstract
One of the main elements in the Yogyakarta privilege/specialty policy is cultural development, including strengthening cultural villages as an integral part that supports Yogyakarta as a special region. In connection with the development of cultural villages, there is an opportunity to develop cultural tourism based on cultural villages that can be offered to both domestic and foreign tourists. In fact, there are still several problems with developing cultural villages. One of the problems is structural issues which are still dominant, considering that the cultural village was formed by the provincial government with various regulatory policies, and as a result, cultural villages are not given independence to manage themselves but rather are driven by the supra-village. Village dependency is also caused by the village's inadequacy to develop cultural tourism village so it needs guidance from the government and is far from being self-sufficient. This study uses an exploratory qualitative approach, by analyzing each model of a cultural village and its potential for developing cultural village-based cultural tourism. Data collection was carried out by in-depth interviews with government officials in charge of the cultural department and cultural stakeholders in the cultural villages. The results of the study show that the formation of several cultural village models has not resulted in cultural village-based cultural tourism. This is because cultural villages are more preoccupied with serving various policies from the cultural service and budget accountability given to cultural villages. Thus, cultural villages run out of energy to innovate in cultural events that can be offered to tourists. Furthermore, the limited human resources to manage cultural tourism in each village are also an important problem that still hinders the development of cultural tourism villages.
References
Alqarni, Wais, Ghifari, Muhammad Suhail, Asemki, Yuspani, Rizki, Muhammad, Safira, Bela, Nindiah, Isti, Rosa, Melida, Rahmi, Nuzulul, Fadhil, Restu, & Wahyuni, Wahyuni. (2022). Dynamics of Asymmetric Decentralization on the Implementation of Regional Autonomy in Aceh. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 9(3), 185–194.
Anantadjaya, Samuel P. D., Rachmat, Timotius A., Nawangwulan, Irma M., & Tanaya, P. Indra. (2022). The use of Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) on betawi cultural village in Setu Babakan, Jakarta, Indonesia. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 13(1), 210–233.
Anderson, Wineaster. (2015). Cultural tourism and poverty alleviation in rural Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 13(3), 208–224.
Ardika, I. Wayan. (2007). Pusaka budaya dan pariwisata. Pustaka Larasan.
Asriandy, Ian. (2016). Strategi Pengembangan Obyek Wisata Air Terjun Bissapu di Kabupaten Bantaeng. Skripsi (Tidak Diterbitkan). Makassar: UNHAS.
Choirunnisa, I., Karmilah, M., Islam, U., & Agung, S. (2021). Strategi Pengembangan Pariwisata Budaya Studi Kasus: Kawasan Pecinan Lasem, Kampung Lawas Maspati, Desa Selumbung. Jurnal Kajian Ruang, 1(2), 89–109.
Damayanti, Rully. (2005). Kawasan" Pusat Kota" Dalam Perkembangan Sejarah Perkotaan Di Jawa. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 33(1).
Dirgahayani, Puspita. (2013). Environmental co-benefits of public transportation improvement initiative: the case of Trans-Jogja bus system in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 74–81.
Ibrahim, Abdul Halil Hi, Hafel, Muhlis, & Lamasi, Iryani S. (2018). Jailolo bay festival as a model for developing cultural tourism in West Halmahera. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(9), 167–176.
Kornita, Sri Endang, & Yelly Zamaya, Misdawita. (2022). A Study on The Development of Local Potential Leading Commodity for Regional Development in Sengingi Subdistrict, Kuantan Singingi Regency. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 8206–8218.
Luo, Fen, Moyle, Brent D., Bao, Jigang, & Zhong, Yongde. (2016). The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism: National Forest Parks in China. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 47–55.
Mumford, Lewis. (2016). The culture of cities. Open Road Media.
Phondani, P. C., Maikhuri, R. K., & Bisht, N. S. (2013). Endorsement of ethnomedicinal knowledge towards conservation in the context of changing socio-economic and cultural values of traditional communities around Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary in Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26, 573–600.
Supardal, Supardal, Triputro, Widodo, & Nugroho, Tri. (2022). CULTURAL BUREAUCRATIZATION BY IMPLEMENTING CULTURAL-INDEPENDENT VILLAGES ON THE PRIVILEGE OF THE SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA. International Journal of Social Science, 2(1), 1197–1210.
Triputro, Widodo, & Pribudi, Anggarani. (2022). Cultural-Independent Village: Towards Village Autonomy in A Cultural and Tourism Village in Yogyakarta. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 9(08), 7126–7173.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anggarani Pribudi, Vina Dini Pravita, Supardal Supardal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.