Justice as A Law Sacrament: Measuring Justice in Pancasila Philosophy

Authors

  • Yosep Copertino Apaut Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Cendana Wangi
  • Randy Vallentino Neonbeni Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Cendana Wangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i4.330

Keywords:

Justice, Pancasila, Law, People

Abstract

Indonesia as a plural country with a diversity of ethnicities, religions, races, customs, cultures, regional languages, will really rely on a single nation principle, namely Pancasila with the logical consequence that every aspect of its life will be governed by Pancasila which is chaired by the state through its tool, namely the government. fully sovereign. This means that all complex life of society is entrusted to the State, including in the field of law to achieve essential justice. In this regard, the state is obliged to carry out the orders of Pancasila through the constitution, which is used as a guideline and benchmark in every practice of state administration, including aspects of law enforcement that are just for all Indonesian people.

References

Bakir, H. (n.d.). THE MEANING OF AEQUITAS IN THE LEGAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE UPHOLDING OF PROPRIETY VALUE OF JUDICIAL VERDICTS.

Hum, H. B., &; Syafuri, M. (2015). An Analysis of Wedding Services of the Sub-District Office of Religious Affairs Cipocok Jaya, Serang: Seen from Public Satisfaction and Employee Performance. J. Mgmt. &; Sustainability, 5, 200.

Jahar, A. S., Lubis, A. B., &; Fahri, M. (2021). The Use of Maqasid al-Sharia in Maritime and National Resilience Context. Al-Risalah: Forum for Legal and Social Studies, 21(1), 97–110.

Labobar, K. (2020). The Advantage of Peace Theology towards Exclusive, Inclusive, and Pluralist Theology for Realizing Religious Community in Indonesia. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 2(2), 122–143.

Lefebure, L. D. (2016). Religion, Authority, and the State: From Constantine to the Contemporary World. Springer.

Mehra, M., & Sharma, G. (2010a). Negotiating Gender Justice, Contesting Discrimination. Contesting Discrimination.

Mehra, M., & Sharma, G. (2010b). Negotiating Gender Justice, Contesting Discrimination. Contesting Discrimination.

MEMORY, I. N. (n.d.). Fr. Julio Suescun Olcoz, CM.

Riyadi, B. S. (2017). The Philosophy of Law Review; According to Pancasila Ideology Value in Agrarian Disputes upon the Eigendom Verponding Land. International Journal of Development Research, 7(06), 13011–13018.

Saat, N. (2018). The State, Ulama and Islam in Malaysia and Indonesia. Amsterdam University Press.

Sintara, D., &; Suhaidi, S. (2019). Social Justice Value of Pancasila in Local Finance Accountability for Economic Growth. The 1st Workshop on Multimedia Education, Learning, Assessment and Its Implementation in Game and Gamification in Conjunction with COMDEV 2018, Medan Indonesia, 26th January 2019, WOMELA-GG.

Susilowati, C. M. I. (2020). The Philosophy Of Sentencing In Indonesia Based On Dignified Justice. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Law, 22, 173–179.

Suwartono, C., &; Meinarno, E. A. (2012). Value orientation scale: The validation of the Pancasila scale. Indonesian Journal of Psychological and Educational Measurement, 1(3), 175–183.

Usada, A. (2022). Ratio Decidendi of Jurisprudence Toward Good Faith Buyer That Objected the Land in The Perspective Of Pancasila Philosophy. Baltic Journal of Law &; Politics, 15(3), 268–278.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-17