Factors Determining The Adoption of E-Procurement in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera
  • Iskandar Muda Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera
  • Sambas Ade Kesuma Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i2.281

Keywords:

Technology, E-Procurement Adoption, academic service information systems, Literature Review

Abstract

Technology is present to have an impact on business processes, E-Procurement is one form of this technological development. E-Procurement is a transaction for the procurement of goods and services by using internet services as a connecting tool in the transaction process. This research investigates the determinants of adopting e-procurement in several developing countries. This study reinforces the results of previous research on the determinants of E-Procurement adoption presented in the form of a systematic literature review (SLR). To evaluate and understand the patterns or themes of the selected documents, a systematic literature review is then carried out. In this study, 157 documents from various countries were published in peer-reviewed journals from 2000-2022 which were systematically reviewed. The results of the study reveal that in general the determinants of an entity in adopting E-Procurement are politics, socio-economic, demographic, geographical, government regulations, supplier participation and intentions, external organizational pressure, internal organizational support, network connectivity/integration, increased task or convenience in work, organizational culture, perception of resources, company size, electronic systems for processing orders and invoicing, organizational factors, readiness factors, supply factors, strategic factors, policy factors, innovation factors (Trust, Excellence/ benefits and image) moderating factors (uncertainty), Current Problems, Facilitators, inhibitors, potential benefits, Quality of Information (Online Information, Purchasing Procedures) and Quality of Logistics Fulfillment (accuracy of orders fulfilled, timely orders fulfilled).

References

Aguiar, A., Arantes, A., & Valadares, L. (2013). Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management Evidence of the impacts of public e-procurement?: The Portuguese experience. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.07.004

Batenburg, R. (2007). E-procurement adoption by European firms: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(3), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.014

Carayannis, E. G., & Popescu, D. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence?: learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries. 25, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00071-3

Carmeli A, And Freund A. (2004). ?? (Article) ? ??? (Information) [. The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.

Davila, A., Gupta, M., & Palmer, R. (2004). Systems to the Internet?: The Adoption and Use of E-Procurement Technology Models. 21(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00155-X

Emery, T., Mélon, L., & Spruk, R. (2022). Does e-procurement matter for economic growth?? Subnational evidence from Australia. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, xxxx, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2022.09.005

Hilal, M., Maqsood, T. and Abdekhodaee, A. (2019), “A scientometric analysis of BIM studies in facilities management”, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 122-139.

Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A. (2019), “Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 125, pp. 285-307opkko

Johnson, M. (2012), “A study of e-market adoption barriers in the local government sector”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 509-536.

Kothari, T., Hu, C., & Roehl, W. S. (2005). e-Procurement: An emerging tool for the hotel supply chain management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 24(3), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.09.004

Kumar, N., & Ganguly, K. K. (2020). performance measures. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0353

Lafkihi, M., Pan, S. and Ballot, E. (2019), “Freight transportation service procurement: a literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel e-commerce”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 125, pp. 348-365

Mélon, L. (2020). The impact of e-procurement on institutional quality. 789461(789461). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2019-0050

Moon, M. J. (2018). Jurnal Pengadaan Umum.

Muffatto, M., & Payaro, A. (2004). Implementation of e-procurement and e-fulfillment processes?: A comparison of cases in the motorcycle industry. 89, 339–351.

Nandankar, S., & Sachan, A. (2020). Electronic procurement adoption , usage and performance?: a literature review. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0031

Tit, A., Yu, W., Yevu, S. K., & Nani, G. (2019). Towards an integration framework for promoting electronic procurement and sustainable procurement in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119493

Vaidya, K., Callender, G., Publik, J. P., & Penulis, U. (2017). Jurnal Pengadaan Umum.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-27