The Impact of Gamification on Female Gen Z Users’ Continuance Intention to Use Digital Payment Method in Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i2.263Keywords:
Gamification, digital payment services, intention to use, intention to continue useAbstract
The rapid advancement in technology today has altered the way and conduct of customers when making purchases. Almost every part of life has started to change from conventional to digital. This is relevant, for example, in the case of payment transactions. The large number of e-commerce industries, online transportation, and payment systems through digital payment applications reflect Indonesia's rapid digitalization. The payment system emerged as a revolution that transformed the cash payment system into a non-cash payment system. GoPay, OVO, Dana, Linkaja, Qris, Shopee Pay Later, Doku, and other digital payment methods are currently available in Indonesia. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the gamification on the intention to continue using the Digital Payment Services. This form of study is known as quantitative analysis. This study's data source is primary data collected from digital payment users in Indonesia.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 50: 179–211. Link: Https://Bit. Ly/3IZ9iqX. Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. Google Scholar
Aparicio, A. F., Vela, F. L. G., Sánchez, J. L. G., & Montes, J. L. I. (2012). Analysis and application of gamification. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Interacción Persona-Ordenador, 1–2. Google Scholar
Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2017). Studying student differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 550–585. Elsevier
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 351–370. Google Scholar
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. Elsevier
Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., & Ondrus, J. (2015). A critical review of mobile payment research. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(5), 265–284. Elsevier
Del Bosque, I. A. R., & Crespo, Á. H. (2005). La propensión a innovar en la adopción del comercio electrónico B2C: un análisis sobre la base de la Teoría de Acción Razonada. XVII Encuentro de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing [Archivo de Ordenador]: Madrid, 22-23 de Septiembre de 2005: Emark 2005, 723–738. Google Scholar
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9–15. Google Scholar
Fang, Y., Ma, Y., Mo, D., Zhang, S., Xiang, M., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Methodology of an exercise intervention program using social incentives and gamification for obese children. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–10. Google Scholar
Gerdenitsch, C., Sellitsch, D., Besser, M., Burger, S., Stegmann, C., Tscheligi, M., & Kriglstein, S. (2020). Work gamification: Effects on enjoyment, productivity and the role of leadership. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, 100994. Google Scholar
Khan, G. F., Sarstedt, M., Shiau, W.-L., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Fritze, M. P. (2019). Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an analysis based on social network approaches. Internet Research, 29(3), 407–429. Google Scholar
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). Gamification of physical activity: A systematic literature review of comparison studies. 3rd International GamiFIN Conference, GamiFIN 2019. Google Scholar
Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14, 21–38. Google Scholar
Lee, M.-C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130–141. Elsevier
Leong, C.-M., Tan, K.-L., Puah, C.-H., & Chong, S.-M. (2021). Predicting mobile network operators users m-payment intention. European Business Review, 33(1). Elsevier
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., & Wei, J. (2020). Predicting mobile wallet resistance: A two-staged structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102047. Google Scholar
Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C.-S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268. Elsevier
Mäntymäki, M., Merikivi, J., Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., & Rajala, R. (2014). Does a contextualized theory of planned behavior explain why teenagers stay in virtual worlds? International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 567–576. Elsevier
Martí-Parreño, J., Seguí-Mas, D., & Seguí-Mas, E. (2016). Teachers’ attitude towards and actual use of gamification. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 682–688. Elsevier
Minnema, A., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Non, M. C. (2017). The impact of instant reward programs and bonus premiums on consumer purchase behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 194–211. Elsevier
Morganti, L., Pallavicini, F., Cadel, E., Candelieri, A., Archetti, F., & Mantovani, F. (2017). Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency. Energy Research & Social Science, 29, 95–102. Elsevier
Najjar, E., & Salhab, R. (2022). Position Paper: Gamification in the Learning Process. IJOE, 18(01), 149. Google Scholar
Orji, R., & Moffatt, K. (2018). Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Informatics Journal, 24(1), 66–91. Google Scholar
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. Google Scholar
Sanny, L., Iskandar, I., & bin Yus Kelana, B. W. (2022). Gamification Reward in Indonesia’s e-wallet Market. 2022 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 1–4. Google Scholar
Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 209–216. Elsevier
Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843. Google Scholar
Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Guo, Y. (2019). Antecedents of trust and continuance intention in mobile payment platforms: The moderating effect of gender. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 33, 100823. Elsevier
Tobon, S., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & García-Madariaga, J. (2020). Gamification and online consumer decisions: Is the game over? Decision Support Systems, 128, 113167. Elsevier
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Lee, S. H. (2017). The effect of cross-border e-commerce on China’s international trade: An empirical study based on transaction cost analysis. Sustainability, 9(11), 2028. Google Scholar
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. Elsevier
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Audrey Thalia Jesslyn, Chiquita Adaora, Jerry S. Justianto, Irene Bunga Amanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
