Collaborative-Constructivism Approach Reading Remediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i2.261Keywords:
Collaborative-Constructivism Approach, Effective Reading Program, Reading Comprehension, Reading RemediationAbstract
The study focused on the students' reading challenges, the techniques, methods, and strategies used, as well as the changes seen following the mentoring sessions. The study's output was the formulation of a plan for peer mentoring. On the second grade non-readers in Toledo City's division, a study was done. The cases consisted of eight students. They all came from low-income homes, and three of them were Pantawid Pampamilyang Pilipino (4Ps) participants. The study was qualitative in character and using the multiple case study methodology. Employed Approaches, Methods, and Strategies Constructivist approaches were applied. Think, Pair and Read, find the underpinning, and Mix Mine were the collaborative learning tactics employed. Adjacent elementary schools in the district or in other districts should be made aware of the proposed peer mentoring plan. The following subjects are suggested for additional research: Developing Teachers' Creativity in the Mentoring Program Coaching and Mentoring as Realistic Ways to Enhance Learning. A management intervention program called mentoring.
References
Akindele, D. O. (2012). Enhancing teamwork and communication skills among first year students at the University of Botswana. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 2–15.
Buck, G. (2016). Peer mentoring and the role of the voluntary sector in [re] producing ‘desistance’: identity, agency, values, change and power. Keele University.
Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 206–213.
Kilag, O. K. T., Ignacio, R., Lumando, E. B., Alvez, G. U., Abendan, C. F. K., Quiñanola, N. M. P., & Sasan, J. M. (2022). ICT Integration in Primary School Classrooms in the time of Pandemic in the Light of Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Early Childhood Education, 4(2), 42–54.
Marcelo, D. N., & Santillan, J. P. (2020). Comprehension and Motivation of ESL Learners: Basis for a Reading Intervention Plan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5197–5202.
McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 5–25.
Meletiadou, E. (2022). The Utilisation of Peer-Assisted Learning/Mentoring and Translanguaging in Higher Education. IAFOR Journal of Education, 10(1), 135–154.
Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126.
Sasan, J. M., Barquin, A. M. E., Alestre, N. A., Librea, A., & Zamora, R. M. (2022). Karl Marx on technology and alienation. Science and Education, 3(9), 228–233.
Sasan, J. M., & Rabillas, A. R. (2022). Enhancing English proficiency for Filipinos through a multimedia approach based on constructivist learning theory: a review. Science and Education, 3(8), 45–58.
Sasan, J. M. V. (2021). The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis.
Savage, R., Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Maiorino, K. (2018). Preventative reading interventions teaching direct mapping of graphemes in texts and set-for-variability aid at-risk learners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(3), 225–247.
Wilhelm, J. D. (2016). “ You Gotta BE the Book”: Teaching Engaged and Reflective Reading with Adolescents. Teachers College Press.
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.
Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback? Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 178–192.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Osias Kit T. Kilag, Ma. Teresa B. Aniel, Viquelyn A. Engbino, Ana Lorraine B. Bubuli, Maridel D. Macapobre, Joana Marie L. Fajardo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
