Policy Reconstruction towards Justice Collaborator Determination of Corruption Cases based on Legal Certainty and Benefits Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i1.247Keywords:
Reconstruction, Justice Collaborator, Principle of Legal Certainty, Principle of BenefitAbstract
One of the problems that sometimes arises in the law enforcement process in the eradication of corruption crimes is the problem related to determining the status as a witness for cooperating perpetrators or justice collaborators in solving a corruption case. The existence of several problems stemming from the inequality of understanding or not having unification of policies in determining the status of the perpetrator as a cooperating perpetrator witness or justice collaborator along with the benefits arising from the determination of the cooperating perpetrator witness or justice collaborator certainly creates legal uncertainty and also does not provide benefits or utility for the party who is determined as a cooperating perpetrator witness or justice collaborator. The reconstruction of the policy of establishing appropriate legal norms aims to regulate the recognition or recognition and understanding or perception of the same legally regarding the determination of the status of cooperating perpetrator witnesses or justice collaborators that apply from the examination stage at the investigation level to the examination stage at the court level even up to the implementation of its execution in order to create the principle of legal certainty for the Defendant who is designated as cooperating perpetrator witnesses or justice collaborators.
References
Achmad, Farhan Fauzie, & Taun, Taun. (2022). Peran Justice Collaborator dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(5), 7950–7958.Google Scholar
Ariyanti, Dwi Oktafia, & Ariyani, Nita. (2020). Model Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 328–344. Google Scholar
Bangkut, Natasha Stella. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Gelar Perkara Oleh Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 7(2). Google Scholar
DEWI, ASMARA, Syarifuddin, Amir, & Febriani, Indah. (2017). Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2000 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Peran Serta Masyarakat Dan Pemberian Penghargaan Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kota Palembang. Sriwijaya University. Google Scholar
Hikmawati, Puteri. (2016). Upaya Perlindungan Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 4(1), 87–104. Google Scholar
Margono, Prasetyo. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Sertahak Hak Saksi Ditinjau Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban. Jurnal Independent, 5(1), 44–59. Google Scholar
Mulyadi, Lilik. (2014). Menggagas Konsep Dan Model Ideal Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime Di Indonesia Masa Mendatang. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(2), 101–116. Google Scholar
Pratama, Syawalahudin Yoga, Muhammad, Ali, & Tando, Cahyoko Edi. (2022). Meninjau Kebijakan Ide Pemasyarakatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Reviewing inmate ideas policy in a unified criminal justice system. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 6889–6894. Google Scholar
RAMADHAN, MUHAMMAD KURNIA. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Terhadap Pelapor Penyalahgunaan Narkotika (Tinjauan Yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban). Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB. Google Scholar
Saputra, DADIN E. K. A. (2015). Hubungan Antara Equality Before the Law dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia dengan Harmonisasi Konflik Antar Lembaga Penegak Hukum. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 15(1). Google Scholar
Semendawai, Abdul Haris. (2016). Penetapan Status Justice Collaborator bagi Tersangka atau Terdakwa dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 3(3), 468–490. Google Scholar
Soekanto, Soerjono, & Mamudji, Sri. (2001). Penelitian Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Google Scholar
Sutanti, Rahmi Dwi. (2013). Kebijakan Formulasi Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Sebagai Alasan Peringanan Pidana Dalam Rangka Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional. LAW REFORM, 8(2), 146–165. Google Scholar
Tambajong, Yefta. (2021). Pengembalian Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban. Lex Crimen, 10(4). Google Scholar
Tinambunan, Samuel Jimmi S. H. (2018). Penerapan Justice Collaborator pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (Studi Putusan Nomor: 151/PID. SUS/TPK/2015/PN. JKT. PST). Universitas Sumatera Utara. Google Scholar
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Setiyono Setiyono, Eriyantouw Wahid, I Komang Suka’arsana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
