Workers Rights’ Implications Who Have Experienced Termination of Employment According to The Law Number 13 of 2003 Concerning Employment

Authors

  • Asuan Asuan Faculty of Law, Universitas Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Rizayusmanda Rizayusmanda Faculty of Law, Universitas Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i1.233

Keywords:

legal protection, termination of employment, workers' rights

Abstract

This journal entitled Implications of the Rights of Workers Who Experiencing Termination of Employment (PHK) According to Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower discusses legal remedies that can be taken by workers who experience Termination of Employment (PHK) as a result of not fulfilling their rights by employers and legal sanctions against employers who violate workers' rights based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The results of this study indicate that workers can submit legal remedies to employers not giving rights due to layoffs mentioned in Article 171 of Law no. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, namely workers/laborers who experience termination of employment without the establishment of an industrial relations dispute resolution institution and administrative (bipartid)/civil measures and legal sanctions against employers who violate workers' rights as a result of layoffs, namely criminal and administrative sanctions. Article 189 Criminal sanctions of imprisonment, confinement and/or fines do not eliminate the obligation of employers to pay rights and/or compensation to workers or workers/laborers and Article 190 paragraph (2) namely administrative sanctions, namely warnings, written warnings, restrictions on activities business, freezing of business activities, cancellation of approval, cancellation of registration, temporary suspension of part or all of the means of production, up to revocation of permits.

References

Hamid, A. (2021). The application of the rights and obligations of workers during the Covid-19 outbreak in Indonesia: Labor Law Perspective. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 3(3), 26–37. Google Scholar

Hanitijo, S. R. (1988). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia. Google Scholar

Husni, L. (2010). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Rajawali Pers. Google Scholar

Husni, L. (2012). Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Khoe, F. N. (2013). Hak pekerja yang sudah bekerja namun belum menandatangani perjanjian kerja atas upah ditinjau berdasarkan Undang-Undang nomor 13 tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan. Calyptra, 2(1), 1–12. Google Scholar

Putra, C. V. A. (2017). Urgensi Klausula Definisi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, 39(1), 61–77. Google Scholar

Rivera, K. (2017). Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Pada PT Multindo Auto Finance Pekanbaru Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Universitas Islam Riau. Google Scholar

Sitompul, M. M. (2021). Perkembangan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Dan Perlindungan Hak-hak Konstitusional Pekerja/ Buruh Indonesia. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Soekanto, S. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Depok: UI-Press. Google Scholar

Subekti, R. (2014). Aneka Hukum Perjanjian. Citra Aditya Bakti. Google Scholar

Sutedi, A. (2009). Hukum perburuhan. Sinar Grafika. Google Scholar

Turangan, R. A. (2016). Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Lex Privatum, 4(1). Google Scholar

Wahyuono, K., & Wahjuningati, E. (2022). Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Di Pt. Langgeng Makmur Industri Tbk. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan. Google Scholar

Wijayanti, A. (2009). Hukum ketenagakerjaan pasca reformasi (Vol. 1). Sinar Grafika. Google Scholar

Zainal, A. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan cet 8. Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-01-26