Risk of Brownfield during Construction Stage: Case Study of PLTGU Project in Indonesia

Authors

  • Nasrudin Rozaq Departement of Civil Engingeering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Jati Utomo Dwi Hatmoko Departement of Civil Engingeering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Ferry Hermawan Departement of Civil Engingeering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v2i12.210

Keywords:

Brownfield risk, construction phase, land

Abstract

Projects at the brownfield location cannot be separated from potential hazards related to geotechnical conditions and the existing project site. The construction phase is carried out at a location in the middle of an already operating factory. Lack of understanding of site characteristics and minimal use of the technology used can result in the project not meeting what was expected. This study aims to identify brownfield risk events during the construction phase of the PLTGU project development in Indonesia. This research uses quantitative and qualitative methods with a case study approach. Primary data were collected using documentation, field observations, survey questionnaires and structured interviews. The results of the study identified 23 (twenty three) and 6 (six) main risks based on the rankings, namely: 1) Groundwater level risk, 2) Location infrastructure damage, 3) Flood risk, 4) Structural damage and structural settlement, 5) Land subsidence, 6) Leakage of existing underground pipes. risks affecting project performance during the construction phase. The results of the study reveal that these risk events are risks that must be managed by project management during the construction phase.

References

Alker, S., Joy, V., Roberts, P., & Smith, N. (2000). The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560010766 Google Scholar

Brahm, F., & Tarziján, J. (2015). Does complexity and prior interactions affect project procurement? Evidence from mining mega-projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1851–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.005 Elsevier

Brassington, F. C. (1986). The inter-relationship between changes in groundwater conditions and engineering construction. Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 3(1), 47–50. Google Scholar

Brink, G., & Tinto, R. (2021). A settlement hazard risk management framework for the development of backfilled open-cut quarries backfilled open-cut quarries. August. Elsevier

Castaldo, P., Calvello, M., & Palazzo, B. (2013). Probabilistic analysis of excavation-induced damages to existing structures. Computers and Geotechnics, 53, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.04.008 Elsevier

Charles, J. A. (2008). The engineering behaviour of fill materials: the use, misuse and disuse of case histories. Géotechnique, 58(7), 541–570. Google Scholar

Day, P. W. (2013). A contribution to the advancement of geotechnical engineering in South Africa. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. Google Scholar

De, M., & Rout, S. K. (2022). An {Approach} for {Geotechnical} {Site} {Characterization} of {Brown} {Field} {Site} of a {Steel} {Plant}. In Ground {Characterization} and {Foundations} (pp. 73–88). Springer. Google Scholar

De Sousa, C. (2000). Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: A private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with Brownfield redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 831–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560020001719 Google Scholar

Farrance, S., & Taylor, K. (2012). Corinda to {Darra} rail upgrade project: the challenges of brownfield construction and integration while maintaining network operations. Google Scholar

Hassan, K., Wasnik, R. V., Singh, H., Kamal, F. R., & Takeiddine, O. (2016). Overcoming the design challenges of brownfield projects. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference 2016, 2016-Janua(November), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.2118/183081-ms Google Scholar

Hills, C. W. W. (1994). The University Of Nottingham. Google Scholar

Jenkins, K., Hall, J., Glenis, V., & Kilsby, C. (2018). A Probabilistic Analysis of Surface Water Flood Risk in London. Risk Analysis, 38(6), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12930 Google Scholar

Luo, Q., Catney, P., & Lerner, D. (2009). Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: Lessons for China? Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.001 Elsevier

Malik, M. S. (2021). Delivering Brown-Field Projects in the Petrochemical Industry: Challenges and Recommended Solutions. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), 10(4), 39–45. Google Scholar

Štefa?ák, J. (2019). Revitalization of Brownfield Sites–Example of the Solution of the Geotechnical Issues. International Conference on Critical Thinking in Sustainable Rehabilitation and Risk Management of the Built Environment, 519–526. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20