Burden of Proof Reverse as A Solution to Eradicate Bribery in Criminal Acts of Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v2i9.160Keywords:
Burden of Proof Reverse, Bribery, CorruptionAbstract
The assumption that corruption is seen as an extraordinary crime (extraordinaru crime) and transnational and cross-border crimes causes that in terms of eradicating it needs to be carried out in an extraordinary manner (extra ordinary counter measure). There is a stereotype in the community regarding gratification and bribery, it is difficult to prove it, so it is necessary to apply an exception (enforcement exceptionality) through the application of reversing the burden of proof which will make it difficult for the public prosecutor to escape from the snares of the law. The research’s purpose of implementing the method of reversing the burden of proof in addition to making it easier for public prosecutors to ensnare perpetrators of gratification and bribery is to minimize the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption. It is hoped that the results of this research will be able to contribute ideas and suggestions for the development of legal science, especially those related to criminal procedural law. It is also hoped that this research will become part of the library information media that provides benefits to sharpen the quality in making further research on formal criminal law. This normative research is supported by primary data, in addition to using secondary data which is a literature study in the form of laws and regulations. There is a stipulation of the method of reversing the burden of proof, shifting the burden of proof from the public prosecutor to the defendant.
References
Alfitra, S. H. (2014). Modus Operandi Pidana Khusus di Luar KUHP: korupsi, money laundering, & trafficking. Raih Asa Sukses. Google Scholar
Ali, M. Z. (2016). Kebijakan Kriminal. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Google Scholar
Heard, B. P., Brook, B. W., Wigley, T. M., & Bradshaw, C. J. (2017). Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 1122-1133 Scopus
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2013). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Google Scholar
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. Google Scholar
Prodjohamidjojo, M. (2000). Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Delik Korupsi (UU No. 31 Tahun 1999). Google Scholar
Rahim, A., & Mokobombang, M. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi:(Studi Perkara Nomor: 22/Pid. Sus-TPK/2018/PN. Gto). Al-Mizan, 16(2), 225–248. Google Scholar
Rahmad, R. A. (2019). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Google Scholar
Samosir, A. (2017). Pembuktian Terbalik: suatu Kajian Teoretis terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, 11(1). Google Scholar
Soekanto, S. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Google Scholar
Suyatno, K. (2005). Kolusi, dan Nepotisme. Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta. Google Scholar
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang, Rini Purwaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
