Legal Protection of Trade Secrets in a Business Portfolio Against Misuse by Former Employees: An Analysis of Judgment No. 1035/Pdt.G/2022/Pn.Jkt.Pst

Authors

  • Henni Wijayanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Syaela Rizkiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v6i6.1440

Keywords:

legal protection, Unlawful Acts, Trade Secrets

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving digital economy, business information such as marketing strategies, product designs, customer databases, and project portfolios possesses significant economic value due to its capacity to provide competitive advantages for business actors. This study analyzes the legal protection of Trade Secrets concerning the Van Houten Portfolio owned by PT Flux Asia Solusindo, which was unlawfully used by its former employee, as well as examines the application of law by the judges in Decision Number 1035/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst. This research employs a normative juridical method using a statutory and case approach. The findings indicate that the defendant’s actions fulfilled the elements of trade secret infringement as stipulated under Article 13 of Law Number 30 of 2000 on Trade Secrets, as well as the elements of an unlawful act pursuant to Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. However, the judges’ consideration, which relied solely on Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the legal basis for the decision, does not fully reflect the application of the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali, whereby specific legal provisions should prevail over general provisions.

References

Anderson, R. (2021). Security engineering: A guide to building dependable distributed systems (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Castellaneta, F., Conti, R., & Kacperczyk, A. (2017). Money secrets: How does trade secret legal protection affect firm market value? Evidence from the uniform trade secret act. Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 834–853.

Correa, C. M. (2019). Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: A commentary on the TRIPS agreement (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dagher, G. G., Mohler, J., Milojkovic, M., & Marella, P. B. (2018). Ancile: Privacy-preserving framework for access control and interoperability of electronic health records using blockchain technology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 283–297.

Drahos, P. (2016). A philosophy of intellectual property. Routledge.

Gervais, D. J. (2020). The TRIPS agreement: Drafting history and analysis (5th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

IBM. (2024). Cost of a data breach report 2024. IBM Security.

Jorda, K. A. (2018). Trade secret protection and management. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 13(4), 245–257.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2020). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 tentang Rahasia Dagang.

Lemley, M. A. (2019). The surprising virtues of treating trade secrets as IP rights. Stanford Law Review, 61(2), 311–353.

Maskus, K. E. (2020). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

May, C. (2015). The global political economy of intellectual property rights: The new enclosures. Routledge.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Digital economy outlook 2022. OECD Publishing.

Parr, R. L. (2018). Intellectual property: Valuation, exploitation, and infringement damages. John Wiley & Sons.

Petronio, S., & Reierson, J. (2015). Regulating the privacy of confidentiality: Grasping the complexities through communication privacy management theory. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions (pp. 365–383). Routledge.

PwC. (2023). Global digital trust insights survey 2023. PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Santiago, F. (2017). Trade secret protection in the globalization era.

Sari, D. P. (2021). Perlindungan hukum rahasia dagang dalam era digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, 15(2), 145–159.

Vecellio Segate, R. (2020). Securitizing innovation to protect trade secrets between “the East” and “the West”: A neo-Schumpeterian public legal reading. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 37(1).

Verizon. (2024). Data breach investigations report 2024. Verizon Enterprise.

World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). World intellectual property report 2023: Innovation in the digital economy.

World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS).

World Trade Organization. (2022). World trade report 2022: Climate change and international trade.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25