Comparative Analysis of Legal Certainty in Fiduciary Guarantees for Defaulting Visit of Justice and Economic Analysis of Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1405Keywords:
Fiduciary Collateral, Credit Agreement, DefaultAbstract
In Indonesia, fiduciary guarantees serve as a critical mechanism for securing credit agreements by providing creditors with the right to execute collateral if debtors default. However, the issuance of Constitutional Court Decisions No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 has significantly altered the execution mechanism, shifting it from parate execution—direct execution without court involvement—to a mechanism that requires either mutual agreement between the creditor and debtor or a court order. This change has created legal uncertainty, particularly regarding the balance between creditor protection and debtor rights. This research aims to analyze the legal certainty of fiduciary collateral execution against defaulting debtors by integrating the perspectives of justice and the Economic Analysis of Law. The method used in this research is a normative legal approach, which examines and analyzes applicable legal provisions as well as theories related to justice and legal economics. In this context, the theory of justice is used to understand the principles of fairness that should be applied in resolving disputes over fiduciary collateral, while the Economic Analysis of Law is employed to evaluate the economic impact of legal practices related to the execution of fiduciary collateral on both creditors and debtors. The findings of this research are expected to provide insights into how the law can achieve a balance between legal certainty, justice for the parties involved, and economic efficiency in the application of fiduciary collateral execution against defaulting debtors.
References
Abdullah, J. (2016). Jaminan fidusia (Tata cara dan pendaftaran eksekusi). Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Islam UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, 4(2).
Afra, F., Purba, F. N. G., & Adilla, S. (2023). Analisis hukum konsep jaminan dalam penyelesaian kasus kredit jaminan fidusia di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 59–72.
Arfiani, M. (2022). Eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia pasca keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Ilmu dan Budaya, 43(2), 202–228.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Gagasan negara hukum Indonesia. BPHN Departemen Kehakiman.
Fauzia, A., Octavia, D. G. R., & Hamdani, F. (2022). The conflict of the norms in the execution of secured objects which are enforced by liability rights when the debtor is bankrupt. Progressive Law Review, 4(1), 1–9.
HS, S. (2017). Perkembangan hukum jaminan di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kizi, S., & Elmira, F. (2018). Some aspects of the responsibility of the parties to the agreement of consumer lending. Journal of European Law, 290.
Lombogia, R. (2013). Perkembangan lembaga jaminan fidusia di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 1(4), 5–12.
Mayulu, P., Dungga, W. A., & Abdussamad, Z. (2024). Upaya penyelesaian jika debitur wanprestasi dalam perjanjian kredit dengan jaminan fidusia pada BRI KCP Unit Paguyaman. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 3(5), 1427–1436.
Meher, M., Kamello, T., Sirait, N. N., & Saidin, O. K. (2021). Protection of consumer rights in bank credit agreements based on the principle of balance. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 16(2).
Merista, O. (2016). Hak cipta sebagai obyek jaminan fidusia ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Veritas et Justitia, 2(1), 204–230.
Orza, R. I. (2021). The loan agreement and consumer protection: An overview on credit agreements concluded in foreign currency. Curentul Juridic, 85(2), 68–86.
Podung, D. M. (2016). Kredit macet dan penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam perbankan. Lex Crimen, 5(3), 49–56.
Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Rizki, M. J. (2020). Pasca putusan MK, OJK minta klausul perjanjian pembiayaan diperbaiki. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pasca-putusan-mk--ojk-minta-klausul-perjanjian-pembiayaan-diperbaiki-lt5e68a247e0293/
Satrio, J. (2005). Hukum jaminan hak kebendaan fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soegianto, D. S. R., & Junaidi, M. (2019). Eksekusi jaminan fidusia dalam kajian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 207–219.
Sriwati, S. (2021). Legal protection for creditor under cross default and cross collateral clause in a credit agreement. Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial, 8(1), 12–22.
Sunggono, B. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Windradi, F., Ardjayeng, L., & Sulistyo, H. (2020). Perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor terhadap debitor wanprestasi dalam perjanjian kredit pengakuan hutang. Transparansi Hukum, 3(2).
Yasin, S., Dungga, W. A., & Mandjo, J. T. (2022). Responsibility of the default debtor in the implementation of the credit agreement and settlement. Estudiante Law Journal, 4(2), 639–653.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wennie Melannie, Suparno Suparno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
