Reconstructing Tax Interest Compensation in Indonesia: A Justice-Oriented and It-Integrated Regulatory Model

Authors

  • Maulana Adhi Surya Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
  • Waty Suwarty Haryono Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
  • Cita Citrawinda Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
  • Parbuntian Sinaga Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
  • Hartanto Hartanto Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v6i3.1377

Keywords:

tax interest compensation, fiscal justice, corrective justice, digital tax administration, regulatory reconstruction

Abstract

Tax interest compensation (imbal bunga pajak) is formally recognized as a taxpayer right under Article 27B of the Indonesian Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP). However, its implementation remains problematic due to regulatory ambiguity, administrative inconsistency, and limited technological integration in tax administration. This situation creates structural asymmetry, where taxpayers are automatically subject to interest sanctions for late payments, while compensation for delayed restitution depends on administrative procedures and discretionary verification—raising concerns regarding fiscal justice and legal certainty. This research aims to evaluate the adequacy and fairness of the current regulatory framework and to propose a justice-oriented, IT-integrated regulatory model. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes taxation laws, constitutional provisions, and relevant legal theories through statutory, conceptual, and philosophical methods to identify regulatory gaps and institutional weaknesses. The results indicate that the existing system suffers from normative ambiguity, fragmented administrative procedures, and inadequate alignment between fixed administrative interest rates and macroeconomic indicators such as inflation and benchmark interest rates. Although judicial decisions have strengthened the recognition of interest compensation as a taxpayer right, administrative practices remain inconsistent and insufficiently digitized. Furthermore, current digital tax systems—including e-filing, e-payment, and Coretax—have not yet embedded automatic and transparent compensation mechanisms. In conclusion, the study proposes reconstructing tax interest compensation regulation into a justice-oriented, IT-integrated model based on automatic entitlement, dynamic interest rate formulas, digital transparency, and strengthened institutional accountability to ensure fairness, efficiency, and public trust in Indonesia’s tax system.

References

Angwin, J. (2020). Data and Justice: The Role of Data in Legal and Social Reform. Routledge.

Apeldoorn, L. J. V. (1996). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Pradnya Paramita.

Aristotle, A. (2009). Nicomachean Ethics (W.D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Friedman, L. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198860877.001.0001

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia.

Jatmiko, L., & Bakhtiar, B. (2024). The Principle of Equality in Interest Compensation for Taxpayers in The Reconstruction of Indonesian Tax Law. The Prosecutor Law Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v2i2.45

Kaufmann, D., & Alon, H. (2019). E-Government in the Context of Digitalization and Public Administration. University of Chicago Press.

Mougayar, W. (2016). The Business Blockchain: Promise, Practice, and the Next Big Thing. Wiley.

Pound, R. (1923). Interpretations of Legal History. Harvard University Press.

Purwanto, D. (2018). Sistem Pajak Berbasis IT: Studi Kasus Penerapan e-Tax di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal Philosophy (K. Wilk, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum Progresif. Kompas.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582

Rosdiana, H. (2010). Rekonstruksi Konsepsi Supply-side Tax Policy. 15(3).

Soemitro, R. (1991). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pajak dan Pajak Pendapatan. Eresco.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17