The Nation-State as the Order of the United States: Westphalia, Regimes of Truth, and Global Power Post-1945
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v6i1.1354Keywords:
nation state, westphalia, united states, regime of truthAbstract
This article examines the nation-state not as a neutral political entity or the natural evolution of modernity, but as a historical construct engineered and stabilized through post–World War II global power relations. Using a genealogical approach, this article argues that the Westphalia system did not remain a legacy of 17th-century Europe but was reformulated and operated by the United States as a global order that produced a regime of truth about sovereignty, legitimacy, and political acceptance. Through the institutionalization of the United Nations, the Bretton Woods system, NATO, and a network of international legal, economic, and security standards, contemporary nation-states are conditioned to function as operators in transnational governmentality rather than as autonomous political subjects. Sovereignty is symbolically defended yet materially and epistemically subjugated to the American-centric logic of power. This article also reveals the symbolic-theological dimension of this order, in which democracy and freedom operate as state faiths that legitimize intervention and the selective suspension of the principle of non-intervention. The findings of this study indicate that the post-Westphalia nation-state has undergone a fundamental functional mutation—from an instrument of political emancipation to a global disciplinary apparatus that works through normalization, the production of meaning, and symbolic surveillance.
References
Backer, L. C. (2016). The emerging normative structures of transnational law: Non-state enterprises in polycentric asymmetric global orders. BYU Journal of Public Law, 31, 1–32.
Baris, H. (2021). The Kurdish model of political community: A vision of national liberation defiant of the nation-state. Rowman & Littlefield.
Billig, M. (2023). The national nature of globalization and the global nature of nationalism: Historically and methodologically entangled. Theory & Psychology, 33(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221145554
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.
Caglioti, D. L. (2017). Subjects, citizens, and aliens in a time of upheaval: Naturalizing and denaturalizing in Europe during the First World War. The Journal of Modern History, 89(3), 495–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/692528
Chang, Y.-Y. (2021). The post-pandemic world: Between constitutionalized and authoritarian orders—China’s narrative-power play in the pandemic era. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26(1), 27–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09703-0
Chryssogelos, A. (2020). State transformation and populism: From the internationalized to the neo-sovereign state? Politics, 40(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719874828
Cole, W. M. (2017). World polity or world society? Delineating the statist and societal dimensions of the global institutional system. International Sociology, 32(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916676917
David, T., & Sampaio, G. M. R. (2024). The alternative Bretton Woods: The 1944 International Business Conference in Rye and the postwar international economic order. [Publication details pending].
Freedom House. (2022). Freedom in the world 2022. Freedom House.
Haas, E. B. (2024). Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. ECPR Press.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order. Yale University Press.
International Monetary Fund. (2023). IMF voting power database. International Monetary Fund.
Kumar, D. (2022). Domestic politics and international order: A constructivist analysis of Chinese discourses on territorial sovereignty. University of Hyderabad.
Martin, J. R. (2016). Experts of the world economy: European stabilization and the reshaping of international order, 1916–1951. Harvard University Press.
Merry, S. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification: Measuring human rights, gender violence, and sex trafficking. University of Chicago Press.
Murray, M. (2018). The struggle for recognition in international relations: Status, revisionism, and rising powers. Oxford University Press.
OECD Development Assistance Committee. (2019). Development aid at a glance: Statistics by region. OECD.
Pantazelos, F., Kechagia, P., & Metaxas, T. (2025). The golden age of global economic growth 1950–1970: Characteristics, dimensions and impacts on European countries. Histories, 5(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/histories5040056
Prinz, J., & Schetter, C. (2016). Conditioned sovereignty: The creation and legitimation of spaces of violence in counterterrorism operations of the “war on terror.” Alternatives, 41(3), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375416652810
Rusafov, P. (2025). Norms in the global refugee regime: Westphalian origins and the exclusion of stateless people. [Publisher not specified].
Sanders, R. (2018). Human rights abuses at the limits of the law: Legal instabilities and vulnerabilities in the “Global War on Terror.” Review of International Studies, 44(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000416
Smith, A. M., & Scott, A. (2017). New critical writings in political sociology: Volume three—Globalization and contemporary challenges to the nation-state. Routledge.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2022). SIPRI yearbook 2022. SIPRI.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Global report on terrorism and transnational organized crime. UNODC.
Wang, B., Schlagwein, D., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Cahalane, M. C. (2025). Emancipation in digital nomadism vs. in the nation-state: A comparative analysis of ideal types. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05678-3
Wilcox, L. B. (2015). Bodies of violence: Theorizing embodied subjects in international relations. Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2020). Worldwide governance indicators. World Bank.
World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arthuur Jeverson Maya, Adrianus Lengu Wene
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
