Proposed Problem-Solving Method and Implementation at PT. SKJ

Authors

  • Cheryl Marlitta Stefia Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Heru Kristanto Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v2i7.132

Keywords:

human capital, work standards, human resources

Abstract

  1. SKJ faces several problems related to human capital and there is a mismatch between the work standards set by the company and the objectives that must be achieved. The focus for this case is primarily internal and sometimes influenced by external circumstances (ex: competitors). Current human resources have different skills and are generally unable to do other jobs. This condition occurs in the production section, where workers in the company are required to be able to use not just one tool but all of them. For example, the dough cutting section must understand how to use a seasoning machine. Therefore, this study aims to present a Proposed Problem-Solving Method and Implementation at PT. SKJ to maximize the potential of PT. SKJ in the future. Using fishbone analysis, the Marketing model presented by McKinsey is more familiarly called 7S and schedule management helps to provide the following solutions: (1) prioritize the process of planning, implementing, and evaluating policies in an accurate and periodically determined manner so that they are more organized for all layers including from the perspective of the owner and employees, (2) optimizing human resources by instilling the company's vision and mission for character building for those involved in the company, (3) provide apparent problem solving for work time and payroll processes in order to be profitable and will not cause confuse, and (4) providing a good understanding of the product and encouraging employees to provide input regarding product innovation based on market conditions and existing competitors.

References

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (Vol. 2). Pathfinder international Watertown, MA. Google Scholar

Burggräf, P., Adlon, T., Schupp, S., & Salzwedel, J. (2021). Risk Management in Factory Planning–A Literature Review. Procedia CIRP, 104, 1191–1196. Scopus

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Google Scholar

Demir, E., & Kocaoglu, B. (2019). The use of Mckinsey’s 7s framework as a strategic planning and economic assestment tool in the process of digital transformation. PressAcademia Procedia, 9(1), 114–119. Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S. (2005). How the balanced scorecard complements the McKinsey 7?S model. Strategy & Leadership. Google Scholar

Lewis, J. P. (1993). Project Manager’s desk reference. Probus Pub. Co. Google Scholar

Lewis, J. P. (2008). Mastering project management. Google Scholar

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons. Google Scholar

Suresh, D., & Sivakumar, A. (2019). Impact of schedule management plan on project management effectiveness. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN, 2249–8958. Google Scholar

Wi?niewski, M. (2022). Analysis of the integrity of district crisis management plans in Poland. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, 102650. Scopus

Downloads

Published

2022-07-25