LIABILITY FOR COMPENSATION ON HOSPITALS DUE TO HEALTH WORKFORCE NEGLIGENCE (A CRITIQUE)

Authors

  • Handojo Dhanudibroto Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v5i3.1207

Keywords:

antinomy, criticism, health law, inequality

Abstract

This research examines the implications of Article 193 of Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health, which imposes sole liability on hospitals for negligence by health workers. This provision raises concerns about fairness and justice, as it deviates from established principles of shared accountability in Indonesian civil law. The study aims to critique this legal framework, assess its alignment with international standards, and explore its impact on healthcare delivery. Using a descriptive method, the research analyzes legal documents, case law, and relevant literature to understand the complexities of liability in healthcare. The findings reveal that Article 193 undermines the principles of distributive, retributive, and compensatory justice, potentially eroding trust in the legal system and discouraging hospitals from providing high-risk services. Furthermore, the study highlights that this one-sided liability can create an adversarial relationship between hospital management and health workers, ultimately harming patient care. The implications of this research suggest the need for legal reforms that promote shared accountability among healthcare providers and individual practitioners. By advocating for a reassessment of Article 193, the study aims to inform policymakers and legal professionals on creating a balanced liability framework that fosters a collaborative healthcare environment and enhances patient safety.

References

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Burgerlijke Wetboek], diterjemahkan oleh R. Soebekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio.

Danish Act on the Right to Complain and Receive Compensation LBK nr 1022 af 28/08/2017, as amended by LBK nr 962 af 16/08/2024.

Accident Compensation Act 2001 (NZ).

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Cet. 4. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 3. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), 2015.

Teahan, Áine, Ailish Farragher, dan Jean Long. Analysis of Clinical Negligence Claims in a Range of Jurisdictions. An evidence brief submitted to the Department of Health by the Health Research Board. Dublin: Health Research Board. 2023.

Derry Susila, Timothy. “Tanggung Jawab Perdata Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pengangkutan Laut Akibat Kelalaian Syahbandar Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelayaran.” Skripsi Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 2021.

Yantin, Tri. “Implikasi Yuridis Terhadap Pembuatan Surat Keterangan Waris Yang Tidak Sesuai Dengan Keterangan Ahli Waris (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tegal Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2021/PN Tgl).” Tesis Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, 2024.

Handayani Nasution, Putri dan Ida Nadirah. “Prinsip Keadilan Pemberian Ganti Rugi Dalam Sengketa Telekomunikasi di Indonesia.” Buletin Konstitusi. Vol. 5. No. 2. (2024). Hlm. 75-89.

Sartika, Ratu dan Bambang Herawan Hayadi. “Analisis Konseptual Organisasi Pembelajaran (Learning Organization).” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan. Vol. 10. No. 24. (2024). Hlm. 486-498.

Yogiana Pramudita, Maya. “Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Pemberian Ganti Rugi Pada Perjanjian Baku Pengangkutan Barang.” SYARIATI: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Hukum. Vol. 1. No. 3. (2016). Hlm. 407-436.

Yudha Hernoko, Agus. “Azas Proporsionalitas Sebagai Perwujudan Doktrin Keadilan Berkontrak.” Perspektif Keadilan. Vol. XII. No. 3. (2007). Hlm. 221-244.

The Danish Patient Compensation. “Laws and Regulations”, tersedia pada https://eng.patienterstatningen.dk/entitled-to-compensation/laws-and-regulations. Diakses pada 22 Februari 2025

Downloads

Published

2025-03-12