APPLICATION OF THE ROLLING PERIOD FORMULA IN DETERMINING METACENTRIC HEIGHT (GM) FOR SHIP STABILITY A CASE STUDY OF THE TRAINING SHIP SULTAN HASANUDDIN

Authors

  • Oktavera Sulistiana Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar
  • Joe Ronald Kurniawan Bokau Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong
  • Egbert Edward Djajasasana Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar
  • Firdaus Umatjina Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v5i3.1197

Keywords:

maritime safety, Metacentric Height (GM), rolling period, ship stability, Sultan Hasanuddin

Abstract

The Sultan Hasanuddin Training Ship of PIP Makassar was selected as the research object for this study. The study aims to analyze the stability of the ship by focusing on calculating the metacentric height (GM) value based on the moment of static stability, incorporating both manual methods and computer applications that generate GM values as indicators of seaworthiness according to the Intact Stability Code. The research method used in this study is a case study that involves descriptive, numerical, and comparative analysis of various ship parameters, including the length, width, and inside the ship, as well as other measurements required in the stability calculation. The GM calculation is carried out using the static stability moment approach and compared with the results of recording the ship's rolling period. The results show that the GM value generated from the calculation of the existing static stability moments, if deducted from the total value of the Virtual Loss of GM due to the inertia moment in the slack tanks, will produce an effective GM worth that is used as the basis for the ship stability benchmark. This research could contribute significantly to improving safety protocols and design standards in maritime operations. The benefits of this research include providing theoretical information for lecturers and cadets of PIP and commercial shipping officers, enriching teaching materials on ship construction and stability, and promoting a safety culture by offering practical information to estimate ship stability conditions before more detailed calculations are made.

References

Alamsyah, Zen Zulkarnaen, Suardi, 2021. Analisis Stabilitas KM. Rejeki Baru Kharisma Rute Tarakan – Tanjung Selor. TEKNIK, 42 (1)

Barrass Dr. C.B., Derrett Captain D.R.. Ship Stability for Masters and Mates, Sixth edition consolidated 2006. Elsevier

Farhum St,Aisyah; Panjaitan James P, 2001. Variasi Tinggi Metacentre GM Kapal Pole and Line Pada Perairan Bergelombang. Gakuryoku Volume VII No.2

J. Hind..Stability and Trim of Fishing Vessels and Other Small Ships. Published 8 January 1991

Mujahid, Ahmad S., Sahlan, Wibowo HN dan Samudro, 2011. Kajian Desain Kapal Ferry Cepat Untuk Sarana Transportasi Sebagai Bis Air Untuk Daerah Sungai Musi

BKI. 2003. Petunjuk Pengujian Kemiringan dan Periode Oleng Kapal. Vol. C

Intact Stability. Lloyd’s Reg. 2011

Intact Stability For All Types Of Ships Covered By IMO Instruments

International Maritime Organization dalam Instruments Resolution A. 749 (18) Amended by MSC.75 (69) Static stability

Parlindungan, M., Hadi E. S. (2010). Desain Kapal Ikan Dengan Bentuk Lambung Katamaran Yang Menggunakan Sistem Penggerak Layar Mesin Untuk Muatan Ikan Hidup. TEKNIK, 31(1),75-3 .

Resolution A. 749(18) Adopted on 4 November 1993 (Agenda item 11) CODE ON

BIMCO/ICS Seafarer Workforce Report, 2021

SOLAS. 2008.International Convention for the safety of Life at Sea. Chapter II1. Part B. Regulation 5

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.17 tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran

World Economic Forum Report, 2022

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18