Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Improving Private Universities’ Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i8.115Keywords:
Financial perspective, customer perspective, internal business process perspective, learning and growth perspective, private Higher Education performanceAbstract
The role of private universities in improving quality must accommodate all aspects of the performance of the tri dharma of higher education. The rapid development of higher education institutions must be ready to change. Changes in the global business environment also trigger the increasing intensity of competition between higher education service providers so that each higher education service provider will try to offer high-performance higher education services. This research aims to see how far the implementation of BSC is in improving the performance of private universities. Specifically, this study describes four perspectives, including (1) financial perspective, (2) customer perspective, (3) internal business process perspective (4) learning and growth perspective. They were using the theory of Robert Kaplan and David Norton. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach and data collection by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation studies. The research results indicate that the BSC implementation has been applied in a systematic, measurable, and planned manner so that the Vision, Mission, and objectives are achieved. In an implementation, there is a balance between financial and non-financial.
References
Arifudin, O. (2020). Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Era Revolusi 4.0 Dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perguruan Tinggi Nasional. Jurnal Al-Amar (Ekonomi Syariah, Perbankan Syariah, Agama Islam, Manajemen Dan Pendidikan), 1(2), 1–8. Google Scholar
Balanis, C. A. (2005). Antenna theory analysis and design, A John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Publication, 811. Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152–158. Scopus
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ad.). Boston, MA. Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. (2000). Organisasi, Perilaku, Struktur dan Proses, Edisi ke-5, Cetakan ke-3. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Balanced Scorecard, Menerjemahkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi, Alih Bahasa: Peter R. Yosi Pasla. Google Scholar
Lin, M.-H., Hu, J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lin, C. (2016). Sustainable development in technological and vocational higher education: Balanced scorecard measures with uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 1–12. Scopus
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Google Scholar
Peraturan Pemerintah. Peraturan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Nomor 3 tahun 2019 tentang Instrumen Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi. , (2019).
UU. Undang-Undang RI No 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. , (2012).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Novi Ruhviyanti, Sepryhatin Dioputra, Achmad Pahrul Rodji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
