Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Improving Private Universities’ Performance

Authors

  • Novi Ruhviyanti STMIK IM Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  • Sepryhatin Dioputra STMIK IM Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  • Achmad Pahrul Rodji Krisnadwipayana University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i8.115

Keywords:

Financial perspective, customer perspective, internal business process perspective, learning and growth perspective, private Higher Education performance

Abstract

The role of private universities in improving quality must accommodate all aspects of the performance of the tri dharma of higher education. The rapid development of higher education institutions must be ready to change. Changes in the global business environment also trigger the increasing intensity of competition between higher education service providers so that each higher education service provider will try to offer high-performance higher education services. This research aims to see how far the implementation of BSC is in improving the performance of private universities. Specifically, this study describes four perspectives, including (1) financial perspective, (2) customer perspective, (3) internal business process perspective (4) learning and growth perspective. They were using the theory of Robert Kaplan and David Norton. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach and data collection by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation studies. The research results indicate that the BSC implementation has been applied in a systematic, measurable, and planned manner so that the Vision, Mission, and objectives are achieved. In an implementation, there is a balance between financial and non-financial.

References

Arifudin, O. (2020). Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Era Revolusi 4.0 Dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perguruan Tinggi Nasional. Jurnal Al-Amar (Ekonomi Syariah, Perbankan Syariah, Agama Islam, Manajemen Dan Pendidikan), 1(2), 1–8. Google Scholar

Balanis, C. A. (2005). Antenna theory analysis and design, A John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Publication, 811. Google Scholar

Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152–158. Scopus

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ad.). Boston, MA. Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L. (2000). Organisasi, Perilaku, Struktur dan Proses, Edisi ke-5, Cetakan ke-3. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Balanced Scorecard, Menerjemahkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi, Alih Bahasa: Peter R. Yosi Pasla. Google Scholar

Lin, M.-H., Hu, J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lin, C. (2016). Sustainable development in technological and vocational higher education: Balanced scorecard measures with uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 1–12. Scopus

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Google Scholar

Peraturan Pemerintah. Peraturan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Nomor 3 tahun 2019 tentang Instrumen Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi. , (2019).

UU. Undang-Undang RI No 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. , (2012).

Downloads

Published

2022-06-07