THE DYNAMICS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO THE ELIMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION STAGE IN THE DRAFT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

Authors

  • Rochmadi Rochmadi Universitas Borobudur
  • Boy Nurdin Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i12.1128

Keywords:

Criminal Procedure Law Enforcement, Draft Criminal Procedure Code, Elimination of the Investigation Stage

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the elimination of the investigation stage in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP) on the dynamics of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. The study utilizes various data sources, including legislative texts, government regulations, judicial decisions, and academic literature related to the topic, in order to understand the legal foundation governing the issue. The author analyzed the data through a qualitative approach, employing comparative legal analysis to evaluate the implications of various legal provisions, exploring their effectiveness and relevance in law enforcement practice. Furthermore, the author engaged in thematic analysis to explore the broader impacts of these reforms on legal practice and the enforcement of the criminal law, assessing the effectiveness and relevant of the existing legal framework in light of the proposed reforms. The results demonstrate that the abolition of the investigator position in the draft criminal procedure code has significant implications for the criminal procedural law system in Indonesia, paving the way for further discussions on improving criminal procedure and enhancing the effectiveness of law enforcement. This research could contribute to refining the legal framework and operational practices in Indonesia to ensure a balance between effective crime control and the protection of civil liberties.

References

Ali, M. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Arif, H., Kumar, A., Fahad, M., & Hussain, H. K. (2024). Future Horizons: AI-Enhanced Threat Detection in Cloud Environments: Unveiling Opportunities for Research. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.47709/ijmdsa.v2i2.3452

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2020). The Criminal Procedure Code. In Crime and Punishment in Indonesia. Routledge.

Faigman, D. L., Slobogin, C., & Monahan, J. (2016). Gatekeeping science: Using the structure of scientific research to distinguish between admissibility and weight in expert testimony. Northwestern University Law Review, 110(4).

Geberth, V. J. (2020). Practical Homicide Investigation. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095835

Hamzah, A. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali. Sinar Grafika.

Husein, H. M. (2016). Penyidikan dan Penuntutan dalam Proses Pidana. Melton Putra.

Ingram, J. L. (2022). Criminal Procedure. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429352973

Korkman, J., Otgaar, H., Geven, L. M., Bull, R., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Mäkelä, J.-M., Mattison, M., Milne, R., Santtila, P., van Koppen, P., Memon, A., Danby, M., Filipovic, L., Garcia, F. J., Gewehr, E., Gomes Bell, O., Järvilehto, L., Kask, K., … Volbert, R. (2024). White paper on forensic child interviewing: research-based recommendations by the European Association of Psychology and Law. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2324098

Marpaung, L. (2019). Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan). Sinar Grafika.

Moeljatno, M. (2019). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. PT Rineka Cipta.

Mulyadi, L. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana: Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Alumni.

Nwafor, I. E. (2024). Cybercrime Investigation and Prosecution in Nigeria: Bridging the Gaps. African Journal of Legal Studies, 16(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340108

Salam, M. F. (2001). Hukum Acara Pidana dalam Teori dan Praktek. Mandar Maju.

Stoykova, R. (2023). The right to a fair trial as a conceptual framework for digital evidence rules in criminal investigations. Computer Law and Security Review, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105801

Downloads

Published

2024-12-17