EXECUTION OF MORTGAGE RIGHTS THROUGH AUCTION IMPLEMENTATION WITHOUT COURT DECISION (STUDY OF SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 3600 K/PDT/2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i11.1104Keywords:
execution, dependents, auctionAbstract
The Law on Dependent Rights provides convenience and certainty for Holders of Dependent Rights to carry out execution through public auctions. The execution of the right of dependency can be carried out in two ways, namely the Execution Parate based on Article 6 of the Law on the Rights of Dependency, or through the Fiat of the District Court Execution based on Article 14 paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Law on the Rights of Dependency. In this writing, the main focus is to analyze the lawsuit against the defendant who is considered an unlawful act in the execution of the right of dependency through the implementation of an auction. This paper is expected to provide a comprehensive overview of the legal consequences arising from the existence of a civil lawsuit against the auction of the execution of the Right of Dependency and whether it is possible to conduct an auction without a court determination. The research used the doctrinal research method with the type of research used by the author based on its nature as an explanatory research, using case data in the Supreme Court Decision Number 3600 K/Pdt/2020 associated with principles, legal norms and laws and regulations. Lawsuits and fights create legal uncertainty for the Holder of Dependent Rights, auction buyers and other parties related to the execution of Dependent Rights.
References
Atikah, I. (2021). THE URGENCY OF MORTGAGE AGREEMENT AS AN EFFORT TO REALIZE THE TRUST BY BANK AS CREDITOR. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.31-63
Dewi, K., & Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2024). Civil Law Liability of Debtors in Credit Agreements with Individual Guarantees. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 2596–2610.
Fuady, M. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Erlangga.
Hernoko, A. Y. (1998). Lembaga Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Penunjang Kegiatan Perkreditan Perbankan Nasional.
Isvara, V. (2021). Objectives As Guarantee Of Liability In Problem Credit Agreements (Study At PT. Bank Sumut Utama Branch). Journal of Law Science, 3(2), 78–84.
Lehtimäki, M. J. (2023). Intercreditor Agreement and Contractual Restructuring of LBOs. European Company and Financial Law Review, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2023-0020
Lubis, A. F. (2020). THE STATE DETERMINES LEGAL SYSTEM WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTI SCIENCE, 1(04), 87–94.
Mann, R. J. (2022). Explaining the pattern of secured credit. In The Creation and Interpretation of Commercial Law. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315193939-12
Nugraha, R. A. (2020). Absolute Power on Land Rights Binding Agreement (Study of Verdict No. 698K/Pdt/2017 and Number 483/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Bdg). Authentica, 2(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.1.59
Savelyev, A. (2017). Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law. Information and Communications Technology Law, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1301036
Sutantio, R. (1999). Penelitian tentang Perlindungan Hukum Eksekusi Jaminan Kredit. Departemen Kehakiman RI.
Suyatno, T. (1994). Kelembagaan Perbankan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Syahdeni, R. (1999). Hak Tanggungan Asas-asas Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok dan Masalah yang Dihadapi Oleh Perbankan,. Alumni.
Usanti, T. P., & Bakarbessy, L. (2013). Buku Referensi Hukum Perbankan: Hukum Jaminan. Revka Petra Media.
Widodo, S. (2022). The Religious Courts’ Authority To Adjudicate Disputes Based On Principal Agreements And Security Agreements Due To Different Choice Of Law. Prophetic Law Review, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/plr.vol4.iss1.art5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rahma Dona, Yoni Agus Setyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
