Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Vol. 03, No. 10, October 2023
e - ISSN : 2807-8691 | p- ISSN : 2807-839X
IJSSR Page 2586
https://doi.org/ 10.46799/ijssr.v3i10.556
This work is licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Mapping PT PLN (Persero) Consumer Willingness to Make
Electricity Account Payments (Willingness To Pay) Based
on Regional Characteristics Using the Ranking Analysis
Method
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electricity and Renewable Energy, Institut PLN Technology,
Indonesia
Keywords
ABSTRACT
Account Receivable, Electricity Account,
Willingness to Pay, Regional
Characteristics, Ranking Analysis
Method
Like companies that are oriented to the buying and selling business
in general, PT PLN (Persero) or PLN also has the same business
risk, namely the existence of accounts receivables arising from
electricity buying and selling transactions with consumers. By
getting cash in from billing electricity bills, PLN's operations will of
course be maintained so that service to customers can be even
better. To support securing the company's cash flow, it is necessary
to carry out an analysis related to external factors that influence
the willingness to pay electricity bills by looking at the
characteristics of regional conditions so that mitigation can be
carried out to control electricity receivables. One of the relevant
methods to obtain a mapping of consumers' willingness to make
electricity bill payments is to use the ranking analysis method,
which is an analysis of several rankings on methods including
conducting surveys, interviews with experts based on the Delphi
method ( 2 rounds of interviews) and statistical calculations using
the independent sample t-test and the final test using the Borda
calculation method. In this study, the factors that most influenced
customer behavior related to their willingness to pay electricity
bills were obtained based on regional characteristics, namely
regional education and culture factors, economic factors and
consumer income then the electricity service reliability factor. The
mapping of these factors can be used by companies as one of the
considerations for making decisions to develop operational
strategies in an effort to control the values of electricity account
receivables.
INTRODUCTION
In doing sell buy goods nor services , then will happen A transactions involved seller and
buyer. Transactions that occur the is results agreement second split party or more Good done in a way
cash nor with system instalment or installments. In selling buy also get to know accounts payable
system , because has There is agreement or agreement as buyer can use goods/ services the moreover
formerly new Then do payment, so goods / services the become a debt for buyer/ user if Not yet done
payment. This also applies if buyer use system installments or installments, fees goods or services not
yet paid off become receivables business for seller.
According to the Big Indonesian Dictionary (KBBI), receivables is an amount of money or funds
that are lent and can be obtained billed . In context business , understanding receivables that is bill of
money by a company to expected consumers can paid or paid off in one at most year moment bill
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2587
published . Whereas arrears , according to the KBBI, constitute installments that have not yet been
made paid . Companies must Can arrange the best current assets, cause current assets will used For
operational company . When operating company can walk with OK , then expected company can
produce and improve profitability (Harapan and Prasetiono 2016).
Usual PT PLN (Persero). called with PLN, namely company property of the moving State in the
field provision Genre power electricity For need public common in Indonesia. As a business entity ,
PLN owns business main that is provision power electricity through generator, distribute through
transmission and distribution power electricity to consumer For used . For operate business main ,
PLN does transaction sell buy with consumer order activities provision power electricity can Keep
going walk and can Keep going fulfil need society in Indonesia. Transaction patterns sell buy PLN with
consumer is PLN selling goods in the form of Genre power electricity to consumer Good with service
payment postpaid nor prepaid. Service postpaid in question here is, PLN consumers use power
electricity moreover first and pay in accordance with those used, whereas service prepaid , PLN
consumers do purchase energy electricity moreover formerly in accordance need with do payment up
front new can enjoy Genre the electricity (Sihombing, Sitompul, and Sinaga 2022).
Like business oriented company sell buy in general , PLN also has it risk the same business that
is exists arrears from receivables account that appears from transaction sell buy power electricity with
consumer. Arrears the No Can avoided Because PLN consumers who own one of the different
characteristics is factor economy from consumer That yourself . Apart from that, force majeure is also
one of the reasons reason appearance arrears on transactions sell buy power electricity including
disasters natural nor disaster others. Based on data during in 2022, PLN noted ratio arrears compared
to with income business with percentage monthly highest in the month February is amounting to
4.04% as described in research, whereas For percentage lowest happened in June with ratio 2.61%
(Sundt and Rehdanz 2015; Abdullah and Mariel 2010; Hensher, Shore, and Train 2014; Graber et al.
2018).
On research this, got it PLN still looks at it own ratio arrears to the total income already Enough
low with the average in 2022 being 3%. Based on GMT Research, for company World electricity on
term time 2010 to 2015 , average ratio arrears to total sales is 25%. Even with average ratio of 3% in
2022 , PLN remains own task heavy For maintain mark that . This thing naturally For still maintain
level quality PLN services to consumers , because with good cash flow, then PLN will still can give
maximum service and with reliability supply Genre electricity to consumer (Hampton et al. 2022).
Apart from that , PLN also remains must support government programs For provide supply electricity
to Indonesian society with affordable price in accordance with trustworthy Article 33 of the 1945
Constitution which reads "Economy held nationally based on on democracy economy with principle
togetherness, efficiency fair, insightful environment, independence, as well with guard balance
progress and unity economy national”(Giannopoulos et al. 2013).
Since it was launched in 2008 in Indonesia, it turns out there is receivables pile of customers
until in 2022. Noted based on data, values receivables prepaid on December 31 2022 is reached Rp.
1.93 Trillion , the value Far more tall compared to receivables customer postpaid with value IDR 541
billion.
Become question , why service prepaid payment in advance still own receivables, it turns out
96.6% receivables prepaid originate from P2TL findings or Order Electrical Power Usage, ie violations
committed by customers so that must published bill follow up installments so that make it A
receivables. Meanwhile, the remaining 3.4% originate from bill continuation from implementation
migration and installments Cost Connection (BP) (Blocher et al. 2019).
In 2019 , PLN published Regulation Directors related Consumer Administration Guidelines , as
since perdir the published, PLN will do penalty or fine termination to customer prepayments in
arrears the receivables exceed the stipulated time limit . Receivables Balance Trend Prepaid every the
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2588
month experience increase , while the trend is repayment receivables prepaid experience decrease ,
with setting performance targets receivables prepaid in 2023 , expected receivables prepaid will can
more controlled and of course at a time support acceleration of cash in flow company .
METHODS
This research flow chart was prepared to understand the research process carried out
(Bryman 2016; Bell, Bryman, and Harley 2022). The flow chart used in carrying out the research is as
presented in Figure 3.1 below :
Table 1Research Flow Chart
RESULTS
Criteria Screening Survey
The next stage was to conduct a survey of respondents spread throughout Indonesia who were
PLN employees who were currently handling consumer receivables collection work in their respective
START
Method
Delphi n=10
Analysis of survey results
Analysis of interview rresults
Independent analysis of samples T-test
Analysis results for
research conclusions
END
Analysis of the Borda Calculation Method
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2589
work units or had previously done this work. The number of respondents who were successfully
collected was 156 respondents with questions as follows:
The results of the survey via online media (online ) are as follows:
Figure 1. Amount respondents based on work units
Figure 2. Appearance results survey question First
Figure 3. Appearance results survey question second
Based on the results of the survey conducted, it produces a score or survey value as the
poverty ratio is considered by respondents to be the most influencing factor with a total value of 76.
The second factor is the size of the regional minimum wage or UMR with a value of 62. To recapitulate
the survey results, it is presented in the table as follows. below this.
Table 1Implementation Results Survey
No.
Factor affecting
Survey scores
1
Regional poverty ratio
76
2
Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
62
Gross Regional Domestic
Product (GRDP)
Regional Income
per Capita
Electrical service
reliability (SAIDI/SAIFI)
Menagih langsung/
penyampaian Invoice
Informasi melalui
broadcast (Email/WA)
Pemutusan sementara
secara langsung
Remote shunt trip
Prepaid migration
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2590
Table 2Service strategy information and communication public by the Ministry of
Communication and Information
The Cultural Development Index (IPK) is prepared by referring to the Culture Development
Indicators (CDIs) framework developed by UNESCO. Based on this framework, CDIs are compiled by
22 indicators grouped into the seven dimensions mentioned above with weight percentages as in the
following table:
Table 4. Percentage weight dimensions in GPA measurement
Dimensi
% Bobot
1
st
Dimension : Culture Economic
10%
2
nd
Dimension : Education
20%
3
rd
Dimension : Ketahanan Sosial Budaya
20%
4
th
Dimension : Warisan Budaya
25%
5
th
Dimension : Ekspresi Budaya
10%
6
th
Dimension : Budaya Literasi
10%
7
th
Dimension : Gender
5%
Discussion
3
Electrical service reliability
46
4
Regional Income per Capita
40
5
Regional Happiness Index
32
6
Regional density ratio (area/population)
31
7
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
30
PROBLEM
1.
Information is not
yet synergistic/there
is no agenda yet
2.
Limited &
uncoordinated access
to information
3.
Subjective/a priori
assessment of state
institutions
GOALS
1. Fulfillment of the
public's right to know
2. Accommodating
Community
Aspirations in the
formulation of public
policies
3. Positive image of state
institutions
Public Information and
Communication Management
INSTITUTIONAL
COMPONENTS
1.
Brainware
2.
Software
3.
Hardware
4. Spiritualware
SUCCESS KEY
1.
Authority/Legality
2. Access/coordinati
on
3.
HR is quite capable
4. Infrastructure
Media Usage:
1. Outdoors
2. Traditional
3. Print
4. Broadcasting
5. Face to face
6. Internet - Online
Amount & coverage of
existing information
INTENSIFICATION and
EXTENSIFICATION
Support for state
administrators' policies
and programs
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2591
Expert Interviews
Using the Delphi Method, in this research interviews were conducted with competent experts
in the field of receivables collection. These experts are PLN employees consisting of manager and
senior manager level officials as well as expert director staff who have many years of experience in
collecting PLN consumer receivables.
The interviews were carried out at the PLN Head Office located on Jl. Trunojoyo Blok MI No.
135 Kebayoran Baru, South Jakarta. The number of experts who were interviewed was 10 people,
taking into account that this number was >5% of the number of respondents from the survey
conducted at the beginning of the research.
The results of the first interview along with evidence from its implementation are as shown in
the picture below.
Figure 4. Documentation results interview with experts
The recapitulation of the results of the first interview with the expert is as shown in the table
below.
Table 5. Recapitulation results interview First
No.
Factor affecting
Number of Values
1
Regional poverty ratio
28
2
Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
29
3
Electrical service reliability
40
4
Regional Income per Capita
28
5
Regional Happiness Index
31
6
Regional density ratio (area/population)
27
7
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
29
8
Public Information and Communication
Management Index
31
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2592
9
Education Index
33
Average
30.67
In accordance with the method used, namely the Delphi method, interviews were conducted
twice to ensure whether the assessment made in the first interview was appropriate or the expert
reviewed the answers at the first meeting with the results as shown in the evidence picture below. An
additional influencing factor is the cultural development index, because the education index is one of
the dimensions of cultural development.
Figure 5. Documentation results interview second with expert
The recapitulation of the results of the second interview with the expert is as shown in the
table below.
Table 6. Recapitulation results interview second
No.
Factor affecting
Number of Values
1
Regional poverty ratio
24
2
Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
34
3
Electrical service reliability
41
4
Regional Income per Capita
36
5
Regional Happiness Index
31
6
Regional density ratio
29
7
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
33
8
Public Information and Communication
Management Index
31
9
Education and culture index
46
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2593
Average
33.89
Implementation of the Regional Characteristics Index on Electricity Receivables
From the results of using the Delphi method which has been implemented in this research, the
author will make a comparison between the index value and the actual receivables data per each
province. The receivables data used will be calculated as a percentage to compare the amount of
arrears with turnover in the province. The receivables used are electricity receivables as per data on
31 December 2022 based on reports published by PLN through the 2022 statistical report which can
be downloaded from the web www.pln.co.id. Meanwhile, sales per report for 2022 are also obtained
from the PT PLN (Persero) statistical report which is downloaded on the page www.pln.co.id. The PLN
Main Unit receivables data as of December 31 2022 is as shown in the table below.
Figure 6. PLN Main Unit Electricity Receivables Report as of December 31, 2022
When compared with sales, the average speed of billing days is obtained based on data
contained in the PLN statistical report with results as in the table below:
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2594
Figure 7. Average Billing Speed Receivables PLN consumers in 2022
Meanwhile, for the receivables ratio based on the data above, the receivables ratio obtained
per each PLN parent unit is as shown in the table below:
Table 7. Ratio Receivables Consumer compared to with Income Sale
Parent Unit
Rp Sales
Rp. Receivables
% Ratio
Aceh
3,169,860.30
264,615.45
8.35%
North Sumatra
13,657,082.12
1,030,845.27
7.55%
Boast
3,997,069.69
272,817.57
6.83%
S2JB
10,734,493.35
814,475.73
7.59%
Babylon
1,880,964.69
70,614.79
3.75%
Lampung
5,836,114.55
505,711.64
8.67%
Riau and Riau Islands
8,732,099.94
776,680.04
8.89%
West Kalimantan
3,473,571.51
220,391.17
6.34%
Central Kalimantan
5,717,645.35
388,764.17
6.80%
Kaltimra
5,740,416.33
454,406.52
7.92%
North Sulawesi
4,518,353.18
444,344.83
9.83%
South Sulawesi, Rabar
10,764,478.40
1,079,542.52
10.03%
MMU
1,562,502.32
119,601.89
7.65%
PPB
2,486,011.53
151,894.87
6.11%
NTT
1,460,257.21
45,455.17
3.11%
NTB
2,383,894.84
150,823.87
6.33%
East Java
44,002,627.20
3,398,398.68
7.72%
Central Java and DIY
32,423,939.74
2,239,287.48
6.91%
West Java
62,900,363.72
5,193,774.44
8.26%
Jaya
29,870,292.40
3,014,583.38
10.09%
Bali
7,147,173.78
487,503.36
6.82%
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2595
Banten
44,698,953.02
3,895,233.52
8.71%
Combined
307,158,165.17
25,019,766.36
8.15%
In contrast to the previous average speed of collecting consumer receivables, if you look at the
receivables ratio, which is IDR Receivables compared to IDR Sales, then UID Jakarta Raya has the
highest ratio with a value of 10.09%, different from the highest average collection days found at UID
Banten. Meanwhile, for the lowest value, there is a similarity between the average collection days and
the receivables ratio, namely PLN UIW NTT is ranked first as the unit with the lowest value.
In this research, regional characteristic index trials will be carried out only on parent units that
oversee 1 province, including the Main Distribution Unit/Region of Aceh, North Sumatra, West
Sumatra, Bangka Belitung, Lampung, West Kalimantan, NTT, NTB, East Java, Java West, Greater
Jakarta, Bali and Banten. These 13 units will be assessed based on the Regional Characteristics Index
determined by the Expert . Obtained from this research are as in the table below.
Table 8. Recapitulation of data per region
UNIT x
PROVINCE
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
SAIDI
SAIFI
ACEH
14.75
3,413,666
7.54
6.55
26.06
71.24
10.7
184.98
79.65
52.61
NUMUT
8.33
2,710,493
14.78
9.84
37.94
70.57
4.8
859.87
67.20
50.33
BOAST
6.04
2,742,476
8.95
5.75
32.38
71.34
7.4
252.75
65.95
54.60
BABYLON
4.61
3,498,479
1.95
3.35
38.67
73.25
11.0
85.07
64.20
54.70
LAMPUNG
11.44
2,633,284
9.66
5.82
28.06
71.64
3.8
371.90
47.50
55.38
KALBAR
6.81
2,608,601
21.18
19.57
26.78
72.49
26.6
231.22
92.20
49.72
NTT
20.23
2,123,994
7.63
9.15
13.30
70.31
8.9
110.89
74.95
48.93
NTB
13.82
2,371,407
6.39
4.72
18.65
69.98
3,4
140.15
58.35
61.26
East Java
10.49
2,040,244
3.35
3.33
42.72
72.08
1,2
2,454.50
57.00
57.88
JABAR
7.98
1,986,670
12.81
8.62
32.18
70.23
0.7
2,209.82
61.55
52.04
JAKARTA
4.61
4,900,798
2.90
2.02
182.91
70.68
0.1
2,914.58
32.15
57.13
BALI
4.53
2,713,672
1.03
1.08
34.16
71.44
1.3
219.80
74.70
66.40
BANTEN
6.24
2,661,280
1.11
1.00
39.52
68.08
0.8
665.92
47.40
48.95
Data Testing
From the data for each of the regional characteristic criteria above, testing was then carried
out by comparing it with the percentage of receivables as previously calculated using INDEPENDENT-
SAMPLE T TEST analysis via the SPSS application (Imam 2018).
The provisions used in this research are to look at the significance value of t with the following
explanation:
a. If the significance value of t < 0.05, it means that there is a significant influence between one
independent variable and the dependent variable.
b. If the significance value of t> 0.05, it means that there is no significant influence between one
independent variable and the dependent variable.
a. Regional Poverty Ratio
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was -0.4 with a significance
of 0.35. Because the significance value is 0.35 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0 is accepted
so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point estimate using
Cohen's d for the Regional Poverty Ratio is -0.22.
b. Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was obtained at 1 with a
significance of 0.17. Because the significance value is 0.17 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2596
is accepted so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. For the point
estimate using Cohen's d for the Regional Minimum Wage is 0.56.
c. Electrical Service Reliability - SAIDI
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was obtained at 0.86 with a
significance of 0.2. Because the significance value is 0.2 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0 is
accepted so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point estimate
using Cohen's d for SAIDI is 0.48.
d. Electrical Service Reliability SAIFI
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was obtained at 0.69 with a
significance of 0.25. Because the significance value is 0.25 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0
is accepted so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point
estimate using Cohen's d for SAIFI is 0.38.
e. Regional Income Capita
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was obtained at 1.04 with a
significance of 0.16. Because the significance value is 0.16 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0
is accepted so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point
estimate using Cohen's d for Income per Capita is 0.58.
f. Regional Happiness Index
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was -0.76 with a significance of
0.23. Because the significance value is 0.23 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0 is accepted so
that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point estimate using
Cohen's d for the Regional Happiness Index is -0.42.
g. Regional Density Ratio
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was obtained at 0.4 with a
significance of 0.35. Because the significance value is 0.35 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0
is accepted so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. For the point
estimate using Cohen's d for the Area Density Ratio it is 0.23.
h. Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was obtained at 0.9 with a
significance of 0.19. Because the significance value is 0.19 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0
is accepted so that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point
estimate using Cohen's d for GRDP is 0.5.
i. Public Information and Communication Management Index (PIKP)
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was -0.67 with a significance of
0.26. Because the significance value is 0.26 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0 is accepted so
that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point estimate using
Cohen's d for the PIKP Index is -0.37
j. Educational and Cultural Development Index (IPK)
From the results of the analysis via SPSS, the t-count value was -1.3 with a significance of
0.11. Because the significance value is 0.11 > 0.05, it can be concluded that H0 is accepted so
that there is no significant influence between the two groups. The point estimate using
Cohen's d for the Cultural Development Index is -0.73 . Recapitulation of test results using the
SPSS application with Independent Sample T Test analysis is as shown in the table below.
Table 9. Recapitulation of test results Independent sample T Test using SPSS
No.
Factor affecting
t value
Sign
Point
Estimates
1
Regional poverty ratio
-0.4
0.35
-0.22
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2597
2
Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
1.0
0.17
0.56
3
Reliability of Electrical services -SAIDI
0.86
0.2
0.48
4
Reliability of Electrical services -SAIFI
0.69
0.25
0.38
5
Average
0.77
0.22
0.43
6
Regional Income per Capita
1.04
0.16
0.58
7
Regional Happiness Index
-0.76
0.23
-0.42
8
Regional density ratio
0.4
0.35
0.23
9
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
0.9
0.19
0.5
10
Public Information and Communication
Management Index
-0.67
0.26
-0.37
11
Education and Culture Index
-1.3
0.11
-0.73
From the table above, if you pay attention to the significance value as those with smaller values
have a better influence than larger values, then the Cultural Development Index has the smallest value
which is close to 0.05 so that the cultural development index is the factor that most influences the size
electricity receivables.
Research Results using the Ranking Analysis Method
If compared with the implementation of the survey and the results of interviews with experts
using the Delphi method (2x interviews) and testing using the t-test, the following comparison is
obtained:
Table 10. Recapitulation comparison results study
No.
Factor affecting
Survey
Interview
Expert
T-Test
Sign
1
Regional poverty ratio
76
24
0.35
2
Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
62
34
0.17
3
Electrical service reliability
46
41
0.22
4
Regional Income per Capita
40
36
0.16
5
Regional Happiness Index
32
31
0.23
6
Regional density ratio
31
29
0.35
7
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
30
33
0.19
8
Public Information and Communication
Management Index
12
31
0.26
9
Education and Culture Index
68
46
0.11
By considering the similarity of factors related to income or economic level of the community,
including regional poverty ratio, regional/provincial minimum wage, regional per capita income and
gross regional domestic product (GRDP), taking into account the research objectives to obtain more
specific analysis results, then The average calculation was carried out on these four factors with the
results as shown in the table below.
Table 11. Grouping factor in accordance with similarity character
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2598
No.
Factor affecting
Survey
Expert
interviews
T-Test
Sign
1
Regional poverty ratio
76
24
0.35
2
Regional/Provincial Minimum Wage
62
34
0.17
3
Regional Income per Capita
40
36
0.16
4
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)
30
33
0.19
Average
52
32
0.22
So the final results of the research based on the three methods are as shown in the table below.
Table 2Research results end with using 3 methods
No.
Factor affecting
Survey
Interview
Expert
T-Test
Sign
1
Economic conditions/income
0.22
52
32
2
Electrical service reliability
0.22
46
41
3
Regional Happiness Index
0.23
32
31
4
Regional density ratio
0.35
31
29
5
Public Information and Communication
Management Index
0.26
12
31
6
Education and Culture Index
0.11
68
46
From the data above, with the results ordered based on ranking, the results obtained are as
shown in the table below:
Table 13. Comparison results study based on Ranking
No.
Factor affecting
Survey
Expert
interviews
T-Test
Sign
Rate
1
Economic conditions/income
2
2
3
2.3
2
Electrical service reliability
3
3
2
2.7
3
Regional Happiness Index
4
4
4
4.0
4
Regional density ratio
6
5
6
5.3
5
Public Information and Communication
Management Index
5
6
5
6.0
6
Education and Culture Index
1
1
1
1.0
This is in accordance with the results of the second interview with experts , as the formation of
culture in society is the main factor that makes PLN consumers carry out routine payment of
electricity bills with a rate of 1.0. Another influencing factor is economic conditions/income with a rate
of 2.3, followed by the reliability of electricity services from PLN itself with a value of 2.7.
Data testing using the Borda calculation method
If an analysis is carried out based on regions, in this research the regions in Indonesia are
grouped into 3 regions, namely:
1. Sumkal Regional which consists of all provinces on the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan
2. Jamali Regional which consists of all provinces on the islands of Java, Madura and Bali
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2599
3. Sulmapana Regional which consists of all provinces on the islands of Sulawesi, Maluku, Papua and
Nusa Tenggara
The results of the analysis using the Borda calculation method, according to the literature
obtained from the Toolshero article with the title Borda Calculation Method (Janse, 2019)are as
follows:
Table 3Calculation results weight with use Borda method
Priority
Selection
Calculation Results
Weight Calculation Results
Selvice
Reliability
Economic
Conditions
Education and
Culture
Service
Reliability
Economic
Conditions
Education and
Culture
Sumkal
1
9x7
4x7
13x7
63
28
91
2
3x6
7x6
3x6
18
42
18
3
3x5
8x5
4x5
15
40
20
4
3x4
3x4
0x4
12
12
0
5
3x3
0x3
3x3
9
0
9
6
2x2
2x2
3x2
4
4
6
7
3x1
0x1
0x1
3
0
0
Final Score Sumkal
124
126
144
Jamali
1
10x7
6x7
13x7
70
42
91
2
2x6
8x6
7x6
12
48
42
3
6x5
7x5
5x5
30
35
25
4
1x4
3x4
0x4
4
12
0
5
2x3
2x3
1x3
6
6
3
6
3x2
1x2
2x2
6
2
4
7
5x1
3x1
2x1
5
3
2
Final Score Jamali
133
148
167
Sulmapana
1
8x7
11x7
15x7
56
77
105
2
10x6
9x6
5x6
60
54
30
3
3x5
2x5
3x5
15
10
15
4
1x4
2x4
0x4
4
8
0
5
0x3
0x3
1x3
0
0
3
6
0x2
2x2
2x2
0
4
4
7
3x1
1x1
1x1
3
1
1
Final Score Sulmapana
138
154
158
Interpretation of Research Results
From the results of research using both the ranking analysis method and calculations using the
Borda method, it was found that there were 3 (three) major regional characteristic factors that
influence the willingness of PLN consumers to pay electricity bills, namely educational and cultural
factors, economic factors and community income and then electricity service reliability factors
(Bornmann et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2019). Education and cultural factors are the first factors in this
research, supported by several journals such as (Ajzen 1980; Zeithaml 1988) as consumer behavior or
consumer behavior can influence the consumer's purchasing power, including electricity bill payments
(Al Irsyad et al. 2020). Apart from being related to consumer behavior, it turns out that company
culture also influences the size of receivables, as stated in the research journal by (Jeyachitra et al.
2010; Juliati 2021; Viklund and Wallvik 2014; Anand and Gupta 2002; Atkinson 2011).
The next results of this research are economic factors and community income (poverty ratio,
minimum wage, per capita income, people's purchasing power and others), both based on survey
results, interview results, calculation approaches from the t-test and calculation tests using the Borda
method, both show that economic factors are one of the factors that influence the size of consumer
receivables, this is supported by several research journals, including (Sopranzetti 1998; Mian and
Smith Jr 1992; Sopranzetti 1999; Khairani and Veralita 2015; Unsulbar, Purwati, and Dahlia 2018).
CONCLUSION
Willingness to pay electricity bills by PLN consumers can be influenced by regional
characteristics in order of the most influencing, among others is education index and cultural
development index , economic factors and income , reliability of electricity services , regional
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2600
happiness index , regional density ratio , public information and communication management index ,
the use of ranking analysis methods from several methods can be used to test the dominant factors in
determining priority levels between criteria that refer to regional/provincial characteristics, namely
survey method, Delphi-based interview method with experts two interviews), calculation analysis
method using independent sample t-test, namely comparing statistical data with actual arrears data
per region, then finally Testing was carried out using the Borda calculation method to see regional
conditions based on survey results. From these results, initial mapping can be carried out to obtain the
right strategy for billing consumer electricity bills based on the consumer's willingness to pay
behavior according to the characteristics of the consumer's area.
From the results of 3 methods, namely conducting surveys, expert interviews, and t-test
sample calculations, the average ranking results were obtained where the main factor influencing
consumers' willingness to pay electricity bills was the development of education and culture with an
average value of 1.0, then followed by economic conditions and income factors, namely with the same
average value of 2.3. The third factor with a value of 2.7 is related to the reliability of electricity
services, namely the reliability of electricity services which is measured through the realization of
SAIDI and SAIFI in each region. Meanwhile, the results of calculations using the Borda method get the
same results as the average calculations using ranking. This shows that the 3 main factors that
influence the willingness of PLN consumers to make electricity payments, thus influencing the size of
receivables, are educational and cultural factors, economic factors and community income and
electricity service reliability factors.
REFERENCES
Abdullah, Sabah, and Petr Mariel. 2010. “Choice Experiment Study on the Willingness to Pay to
Improve Electricity Services.” Energy Policy 38 (8): 457081.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.012.
Ajzen, Icek. 1980. “Understanding Attitudes and Predictiing Social Behavior.” Englewood Cliffs.
Anand, Manoj, and Chandra Prakash Gupta. 2002. “Working Capital Performance of Corporate India:
An Empirical Survey for the Year 2000-2001.” Management and Accounting Research, January-
June.
Atkinson, William. 2011. “Think of Accounts Receivable as Sales, Not Collections: Distributors Need to
Get Smarter about Credit.” EHS Today 4.
Bell, Emma, Alan Bryman, and Bill Harley. 2022. Business Research Methods. Oxford university press.
Blocher, E J, D E Stout, P E Juras, and Steven Smith. 2019. Cost Management (A Strategic Emphasis) 8e.
McGraw-Hill Education.
Bornmann, Lutz, Moritz Stefaner, Felix de Moya Anegón, and Rüdiger Mutz. 2014. “What Is the Effect of
Country-Specific Characteristics on the Research Performance of Scientific Institutions? Using
Multi-Level Statistical Models to Rank and Map Universities and Research-Focused Institutions
Worldwide.” Journal of Informetrics 8 (3): 58193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.008.
Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford university press.
Chen, Ning, Lu Chen, Yingchao Ma, and An Chen. 2019. “Regional Disaster Risk Assessment of China
Based on Self-Organizing Map: Clustering, Visualization and Ranking.” International Journal of
Disaster Risk Reduction 33: 196206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.005.
Giannopoulos, George, Andrew Holt, Ehsan Khansalar, and Stephanie Cleanthous. 2013. “The Use of the
Balanced Scorecard in Small Companies.” International Journal of Business and Management 8
(14): 122. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p1.
Graber, Sachiko, Tara Narayanan, Jose Alfaro, and Debajit Palit. 2018. “Solar Microgrids in Rural India:
Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Electricity.” Energy for Sustainable
Development 42: 3243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.10.002.
International Journal of Social Service and Research https://ijssr.ridwaninstitute.co.id/
IJSSR Page 2601
Hampton, Harrison, Aoife Foley, Dylan Furszyfer Del Rio, Beatrice Smyth, David Laverty, and Brian
Caulfield. 2022. “Customer Engagement Strategies in Retail Electricity Markets: A
Comprehensive and Comparative Review.” Energy Research & Social Science 90: 102611.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102611.
Harapan, Anthonius, and Prasetiono Prasetiono. 2016. Pengaruh Average Collection Period, Average
Payment Period, Turnover in Days, Sales Growth Dan Debt Ratio Terhadap Profitabilitas
Perusahaan.” Diponegoro Journal of Management 5 (3): 390400.
Hensher, David A, Nina Shore, and Kenneth Train. 2014. “Willingness to Pay for Residential Electricity
Supply Quality and Reliability.” Applied Energy 115: 28092.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.007.
Imam, Ghozali. 2018. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. 9th ed. Semarang:
Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Irsyad, Muhammad Indra Al, Anthony Halog, Rabindra Nepal, and Deddy Priatmodjo Koesrindartoto.
2020. “Economical and Environmental Impacts of Decarbonisation of Indonesian Power
Sector.” Journal of Environmental Management 259: 109669.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109669.
Jeyachitra, A, E Bennet, P Nageswari, and S Parasuraman. 2010. “Receivable Management of Indian
Cement Industry in a Changed Scenario.” SMART Journal of Business Management Studies 6 (1):
7887.
Juliati, Fina. 2021. The Influence of Organizational Culture, Work Ethos and Work Discipline on
Employee Performance.” AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ekonomi & Bisnis 1 (1): 3439.
Khairani, Siti, and Milda Veralita. 2015. “FAKTOR-FAKTOR MEMPENGARUHI PENYEBAB PIUTANG
TAK TERTAGIH PADA KOPERASI BAITUL MALWAT TAMWIL (BMT) TARBIYAH PALEMBANG.”
Fordema 12 (1): 115.
Mian, Shehzad L, and Clifford W Smith Jr. 1992. “Accounts Receivable Management Policy: Theory and
Evidence.” The Journal of Finance 47 (1): 169200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-
6261.1992.tb03982.x.
Sihombing, Geofani Goran, Rosalinda S Sitompul, and Leonard R Sinaga. 2022. “PENGARUH PERILAKU
KONSUMEN TERHADAP TUNGGAKAN REKENING LISTRIK PADA PT. PLN (PERSERO) ULP
SIBORONGBORONG.” Tapanuli Journals 4 (1): 97107. https://doi.org/10.2201/unita.v4i1.284.
Sopranzetti, Ben J. 1998. “The Economics of Factoring Accounts Receivable.” Journal of Economics and
Business 50 (4): 33959. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(98)00008-3.
———. 1999. “Selling Accounts Receivable and the Underinvestment Problem.” The Quarterly Review
of Economics and Finance 39 (2): 291301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)00016-2.
Sundt, Swantje, and Katrin Rehdanz. 2015. “Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Green Electricity: A
Meta-Analysis of the Literature.” Energy Economics 51: 18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.005.
Unsulbar, Administrator Jepa, Wiwi Purwati, and Dahlia Dahlia. 2018. “Pengaruh Faktor Eksternal
Terhadap Piutang Tak Tertagih Pada Koperasi Guru Rambate Rata (KGRR) Tinambung
Kabupaten Polewali Mandar.” Journal of Economic, Public, and Accounting (JEPA) 1 (1): 114.
https://doi.org/10.31605/jepa.v1i1.
Viklund, Emmelie, and Emma Wallvik. 2014. “Dependence of Strategic Management in Account
Receivable Collections.”
Zeithaml, Valarie A. 1988. “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and
Synthesis of Evidence.” Journal of Marketing 52 (3): 222.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302.
Copyright holder:
International Journal of Asian Education ,
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie
IJSSR Page 2602
Rahmada Mulia Whardana Moljoadie (2023)
First publication rights:
International Journal of Social and Service (IJSSR)
This article is licensed under: