International Journal of Asian Education,
Nita Hasnita
1
, Supriyadi
2
, Abdul Razak
3
IJSSR Page 2260
As a form of accountability for bureaucratic performance in budget implementation, the Ministry
of Finance (Keuangan, 2018) through Minister of Finance Regulation Number 195/PMK.05/2018
concerning Monitoring and Evaluation of Budget Implementation for State Ministries/Institutions
determines Budget Implementation Performance Indicators (R. I. Indonesia, 2015) (Perdagangan
Republik Indonesia, 2022). Based on the Regulation of the Directorate General of Treasury Number PER-
4/PB/2020, IKPA is an indicator determined by the Ministry of Finance as the State General Treasurer
(BUN)(Perbendaharaan, 2006) to measure the quality of the performance of implementing budgets for
State Ministries/Institutions in terms of conformity to planning, effectiveness of budget
implementation, efficiency of implementation (Fransisca, Alya Nikita, Sonia Vitania Hubah, 2021).
budget, and compliance with regulations. Conformity to planning consists of three indicators, namely
Revised Budget Implementation List (DIPA), DIPA Page III Deviation, and Minus Ceiling. The
effectiveness of budget implementation consists of four indicators, namely Budget Absorption, Bill
Settlement, Confirmation of Output Achievements, and SP2D Returns (Sayadi, 2021). The efficiency of
budget implementation consists of two indicators, namely Renkas (Cash Withdrawal Plan) and Payment
Order Errors (SPM). Meanwhile, compliance with regulations consists of four indicators, namely
Contract Data, Management of UP (Supply Money) and TUP (Additional Money Supply), Treasurer's
Accountability Report (LPJ), and SPM Dispensation.
The implementation of IKPA continues to experience developments as well as challenges. In 2020,
IKPA began implementing a new indicator, namely confirmation of Output Achievement Data. According
to the Regulation of the Director General of Treasury Number PER/04/PB/2020 concerning Technical
Instructions for Assessment of K/L Budget Implementation Performance Indicators. However, in the
same year, IKPA was tested by the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia (Donny Maha Putra,
2020). So there are many changes between the suitability of planning and the realization of budget
implementation because it conflicts with government regulations made to handle the Covid-19
pandemic. As well as the Circular Letter of the Director General of Immigration Number IMI.1-KU.01.01-
0397 regarding Budget Implementation at the Immigration Work Unit T.A. 2021, determine the priority
and selective scale for activities to be implemented with a maximum amount of 60% of the T.A. PNBP
Ceiling. 2021 which has been determined. Priority activities include handling Covid-19 and
implementing activities related to immigration services and law enforcement to support increasing the
realization of Immigration Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) (Presiden Republik Indonesia, 1997). Based
on this Circular, it also limits shopping activities for goods such as business trips, socialization, meeting
packages, as well as shopping for goods that can be postponed. As well as limiting capital expenditure
activities such as procurement of motor vehicles, renovation/construction of office buildings and
equipment/machinery.
Previous research regarding budget implementation during the Covid-19 pandemic conducted by
Alya Nikita Fransisca et al (2021) showed a significant decline in the management of money supplies
and budget absorption. However, not all government ministries/institutions during the Covid-19
pandemic experienced a decline, because of the steps taken by Indonesia to overcome the national
economy by carrying out budget refocusing planning management in the 2021 APBN through MBO
(Management by Objectives) in the form of personnel spending, goods spending, and capital expenditure
at K/L has increased (Indonesia, 2014).
At the TPI Kendari Class I Immigration Office, based on a circular issued by the Director General
of Immigration and the Ministry of Finance, regarding refocusing the budget based on priority targets,
so that the budget has been revised to be used as optimally as possible (Pemerintah Republik Indonesia,
2003). This optimization must be carried out in order to carry out immigration service activities as its
main task and function. However, due to the regulation to use 60% of the existing budget, there are
many deviations from Page III DIPA, because the withdrawal of funds is not in accordance with existing