INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SERVICE AND
RESEARCH |
THE EFFECT OF INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE ON NET
INCOME AT STATE-OWNED BANKS LISTED ON THE IDX 2021
Aulia*, Ayu Kurniasari, Dian Anggraini
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]*
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of interest income and interest
expense on net income for the period 2012 to 2020. The research method used is
a quantitative method using data sources from the financial statements of
Concise Profit and Loss for the period 2012 to 2020. The data analysis
technique uses data normality test, Pearson Product correlation analysis.
Moment, coefficient of determination, and multiple linear regression analysis.
Based on the results of data analysis, knowing the effect of Interest Income
and Interest Expense on Net Profit states that the data is normally
distributed, the closeness of the relationship is 0.494 strong category, the
direction of the influence is positive. Interest Income and Interest Expense
affect Net Profit by 85.4% and the remaining 14.4% is influenced by other
variables. it is known that t count (6.088) > t table (2.034) and
significant 0.000 <0.05. This means that partially interest income has a
positive effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange, then t count (-2.382) > t table (2.034) and significant
0.023 <0.05. This means that partially interest expense has a negative
effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange. Furthermore, it is known that F count is 103.149 > F table 3.28,
with a significance of 0.000 <0.05. This shows that all independent
variables, namely interest income and interest expense, simultaneously have a
significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange.
Keywords: interest income; interest expense; net profit
Received 18
November 2022, Revised 24 November 2022, Accepted 7 December 2022
INTRODUCTION
The financial sector is a sector that has a very large
influence in supporting economic growth in a country (Baroroh, 2012). The financial
sector provides support in terms of providing the funds needed for business
development (Fitriasari, 2017). The financial
sector can be in the form of banking institutions, namely banks and non-bank
institutions such as pawnshops, savings and loan cooperatives, leasing companies,
pension funds.
Banks have the function of collecting funds, channeling
funds, and providing financial payment services (Wiwoho, 2014). As fund
collectors, banks save money or provide places for safekeeping of money from
the wider community in the form of checking accounts, savings accounts, time
deposits (Werner, 2014). In its function
as a channeling of funds, the bank will utilize the funds deposited by
customers and distribute them to other customers who need credit loans. When
serving as a financial payment service provider, the bank acts as an
intermediary between customers or between customers and other parties, thereby
facilitating payment transactions.
Banks in carrying out their activities have an important
role in the financial system such as transfer of assets, transactions,
liquidity and efficiency (Ichsan, 2014). The transfer of
assets itself means that the bank transfers funds from the owner of the surplus
funds to the borrower who has a deficit. In the transactional role, banks
provide convenience to economic actors in conducting transactions.
The convenience provided by banks, both government and
private banks is a form of bank service to customers (Salam, 2018). The main
objective of bank operations is to earn profit, most of the bank's profit is
derived from interest income which is the difference between loan interest
income and customer deposit interest. Therefore, the income earned by the bank
will have a positive effect on the amount of credit extended. The more credit
extended by the bank, the more income the bank will receive. Most of the bank's
income is obtained from interest generated from lending which is the backbone
of the bank's income.
According to Law Number 7 of 1992 which was amended by RI
Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking, it is explained that credit is the
provision of money or bills equivalent to that, based on a loan agreement or
agreement between the bank and another party that requires the borrower to pay off
the debt after a certain period of time with the provision of interest (Dyastuti, 2015). Interest income
from credit is the main income for the bank. This situation makes banks try to
increase lending to debtors, in order to increase their income. Meanwhile,
another problem faced by bank management was when the Indonesian economy was
deteriorating, which led to the emergence of non-performing loans and negative
spreads between interest income and interest costs. Under these circumstances
there will be many banks experiencing financial problems, so that banks can be
liquidated because they are no longer able to fulfill the requirements as a
healthy bank as determined by Bank Indonesia. Interest is important in
fundraising activities and channeling funds to banks. Fundraising and lending
will always be linked to interest rates. Interest for banks can be a cost (cost
of funds) that must be paid to savers, but on the other hand interest can also
be bank income received from debtors because of loans given (Rahmadhani & Mawardi, 2011).
To see how big the development of state-owned banks is in
carrying out their business activities. From the results of the financial
reports on the IDX, we can find out the performance of state-owned banks by
knowing the progress of year on year (yoy) profit income. In the following, you
can see a comparison of interest income, interest expenses and the level of
profit earned during the 2012-2020 period at state-owned banks on the IDX. The following table shows a comparison of the
variable component sizes for the 2012-2020 period:
Table 1
Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI)
No |
Year Report |
Interest Income (In million rupiah) |
Burden Flower (In million rupiah) |
Profit Clean (In million rupiah) |
1 |
2012 |
48,772,021 |
12,599,060 |
18,687,380 |
2 |
2013 |
57,720,831 |
14,590,223 |
21,354,330 |
3 |
2014 |
73,065,777 |
22,684,979 |
24,226,845 |
4 |
2015 |
83,007,745 |
26,141,100 |
25,410,788 |
5 |
2016 |
92,151,312 |
26176,473 |
26,227,991 |
6 |
2017 |
100,080,250 |
28,652,214 |
29,044,334 |
7 |
2018 |
108,458,358 |
32,541,395 |
32,418,486 |
8 |
2019 |
118,379,729 |
40,048,971 |
34,400,000 |
9 |
2020 |
109,112,566 |
36,190,771 |
21,757,779 |
Source: State-Owned
Bank Financial Statements on the IDX, and various sources on the official
website of Bank BRI (www.bri.co.id)
Table 2
Bank Mandiri
No |
Year Report |
Interest Income (In million rupiah) |
Burden Flower (In million rupiah) |
Profit Clean (In million rupiah) |
1 |
2012 |
42,550,442 |
15,019,850 |
16,043,618 |
2 |
2013 |
50,208,842 |
17,432,216 |
18,829,934 |
3 |
2014 |
62,637,942 |
23,505,518 |
20,654,783 |
4 |
2015 |
71,570,127 |
26,207,024 |
21,152,398 |
5 |
2016 |
71,145,401 |
22,484,799 |
14,653,163 |
6 |
2017 |
73,271,984 |
24,633,241 |
21,443,042 |
7 |
2018 |
74,454,382 |
23,710,628 |
25,851,937 |
8 |
2019 |
84,431,175 |
29,070,226 |
28,455,592 |
9 |
2020 |
80,093,037 |
28,222,605 |
17,645,624 |
Source: State-Owned
Bank Financial Statements on the IDX, and various sources on Bank Mandiri's
official website (www.mandiri.co.id)
Table 3
Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI)
NO |
Year Report |
Interest Income (In Million Rupiah) |
Burden Flower (In Million Rupiah) |
Profit Clean (In Million Rupiah) |
1 |
2012 |
22,704,515 |
7,254,524 |
7,048,362 |
2 |
2013 |
26,450,708 |
7,392,427 |
9,057,941 |
3 |
2014 |
33,364,042 |
10,988,641 |
10,829,379 |
4 |
2015 |
36,895,081 |
11,334,885 |
9,140,531 |
5 |
2016 |
43,766,439 |
13,773,377 |
11,410,196 |
6 |
2017 |
45,003,201 |
15,272,144 |
17,222,663 |
7 |
2018 |
50,571,284 |
17,684,456 |
19,599,399 |
8 |
2019 |
54,495,996 |
20,939,501 |
19,486,623 |
9 |
2020 |
52,144,058 |
18,101,085 |
3,321,442 |
Source: State-Owned
Bank Financial Statements on the IDX, and various sources on the official
website of Bank BNI (www.bni.co.id)
Table 4
Bank Tabungan Negara (BTN)
NO |
YEAR REPORT |
INTEREST INCOME (In million rupiah) |
BURDEN FLOWER (In million rupiah) |
PROFIT CLEAN (In million rupiah) |
1 |
2012 |
8,818,579 |
4,091,760 |
1,563,962 |
2 |
2013 |
10,782,877 |
5,129,554 |
1,563,161 |
3 |
2014 |
12,807,320 |
7,342,747 |
1,145,572 |
4 |
2015 |
14,966,209 |
8,155,133 |
1,850,907 |
5 |
2016 |
17,138,819 |
8,975,274 |
2,618,905 |
6 |
2017 |
18,446,732 |
9,885,116 |
3,027,466 |
7 |
2018 |
20,781,512 |
11,627,554 |
2,807,923 |
8 |
2019 |
23,271,432 |
15,167,294 |
209,263 |
9 |
2020 |
22,947,752 |
14,687,492 |
1,602,358 |
Source: State-Owned
Bank Financial Statements on the IDX, and various sources on the official
website of Bank BTN (www.btn.co.id)
With the illustration of the table data above, the profit
income of state-owned banks is very fluctuating, therefore BUMN Banks carry out
business strategies, including establishing more reserves for financial
impairment losses (CKPN) in line with increasing non-performing loans (NPL)
ratios.
Table 5
Previous Studies
No |
Name/ Year |
Title |
Analysis
Models |
Research
Results |
1 |
The effect of
interest costs on interest income and the implications for liquidity at PT.
West Java and Banten Banks |
Descriptive statistical analysis was
carried out using central tendency in the form of arithmetic average (mean)
of interest cost, interest income and liquidity variables presented in the
form of tables and graphs, in the implementation of the analysis |
1. Interest costs at PT. Barrk
West Java and Banten in the last four years have always experienced an
increase. 2. Interest income from lending
at PT. Bank Jabar and Banten in the last four years have always experienced
an increase. interest income |
|
2 |
Analysis of the effect of credit interest income and interest costs on
third party funds |
Using multiple
regression analysis test, classic assumption test and partial correlation
analysis |
Based on the
partial hypothesis test (t test), it can be seen that the independent
variable, namely credit interest income (X1), has a partial effect Based on the partial hypothesis test
(t test), it can be seen that the independent variable, namely the cost of
interest on TPF (X2), has no partial effect and has a positive significant
effect on the dependent variable, namely profit (Y). |
|
3 |
|
The Effect
of Interest Income on Profitability at PT. Bank Jabar Banten |
Analysis of interest
income and expense levels using the ROA, ROE, NPM and BOPO methods |
Based on the results of testing the
hypothesis that interest income has a positive effect on profitability at PT.
Bank Jabar Banten. |
This research was conducted with the following objectives; (a) to find out how the trend of
financial performance is in terms of increasing income/profitability through
interest income and interest expenses of state-owned banks (SOE) operating in Indonesia
during 2012-2020, (b) to
find out whether there is a strong correlation between income and interest
expenses on the net profit earned by state-owned banks listed on the IDX during
2012-2020.
METHOD
This research was
conducted by providing an analysis of historical data on the financial
statements of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The aim
is to see the level of net profit of banking service companies by using
financial report data analysis.
Descriptive research
is research that is intended to investigate the circumstances, conditions or
other things that have been mentioned, the results of which are presented in
the form of a research report (Arikunto, 2010). Descriptive
research is research conducted to determine the value of each variable, both one
variable or more are independent without making connections or comparisons with
other variables (Sujarweni, 2015).
Based on the
explanation stated in this study, this type of research is research with a
quantitative descriptive method. Quantitative research methods can be
interpreted as research methods based on the philosophy of positivism, used to
examine certain populations or samples, sampling techniques are generally
carried out randomly, data collection uses research instruments, data analysis
is quantitative/ statistical in nature with the aim of testing hypotheses that
are has been established research
variables are divided into two namely:
1. Independent variables are independent variables whose existence is
not influenced by other variables. This variable is the bank's net profit,
which is obtained from the difference in deducting all income and
expenses/costs. In this case it is defined as the variable Y
2. Dependent variable is a variable whose existence is influenced by
other variables. This variable is interest income and interest expense in the
current year which has been regressed. In this case it is defined as the
variables X1 and X2.
Interest income and loan interest expenses are measured by the
amount of interest income and interest expenses contained in the Profit/ Loss
report.
In
this study, the technique used for data collection was a documentation study. Arikunto (2010)
states that the documentation method is a method used to obtain data by
investigating written objects such as books, journals, magazines, documents,
diaries, and so on. This documentation data collection method is considered the
most appropriate because this study aims to provide an assessment of the level
of bank net profit through other processed data that has been published.
Based
on data sources, this research data is classified as secondary data. Secondary
data is data obtained indirectly from research subjects (Suliyanto, 2018). Secondary data
has been collected and presented by other parties, both for commercial and
non-commercial purposes. Secondary data can be in the form of statistical
research results from survey report books, magazines/ newspapers, documentation
and official archives.
In
this study, secondary data was obtained from the bank's financial statements on
the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange, namely www.idx.co.id ,
Bank's website Indonesia that is www.bi.go.id , as
well as the websites of the concerned banks relevant
sources with the required data as well as various literature sources which
presumably can provide an overview of various technical matters regarding
obtaining maximum net profit. With the data that will be collected, it is hoped
that it will later provide maximum results and reduce data inaccuracies which
will ultimately affect unexpected results (outputs) later.
The
data analysis method in this study is to use quantitative descriptive data
analysis techniques. Quantitative analysis is done by analyzing a problem that
is embodied in quantitative terms. The analytical tool used in this research is
multiple regression analysis with the help of the Statistical Package for
Social Sciences (SPSS). Multiple regressionis a regression or prediction model that
involves more than one independent variable or predictor. The term multiple
regression can also be referred to as multiple regression. The word multiple
means plural or more than one variable.
A. Results
After the data used is collected, the next step is to
analyze and evaluate the data. Before being analyzed and evaluated, the data is
first processed using the SPSS (Statistic Product and Service Solution)
program, which then the output results will be evaluated to determine the
variable interest income and interest expense on net income.
Table
6
Descriptive Statistics |
|||||
|
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Means |
std. Deviation |
Interest income |
36 |
8,818,579 |
118,379,729 |
5.3235 |
3.09809 |
Interest expense |
36 |
4,091,760 |
40,048,971 |
4.3728 |
3.93728 |
Net profit |
36 |
209,263 |
34,400,000 |
1.5049 |
1.02042 |
Valid N (listwise) |
36 |
|
|
|
|
Source: SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
Table
6 above shows that the average value of the interest income variable is the
minimum value for BBTN companies in 2012 of 8,818,579, the maximum value for
BBRI companies in 2019 is 118,379,729, the mean is5.3235and
the standard deviation is 3.09809. This shows that the data is normally distributed, where
is the mean 5.3235 > standard deviation3.09809.
Interest expense variable minimum value for BBTN
companies in 2012 is 4,091,760, maximum value for BBRI companies in 2019 is
40,048,971, mean is4.3728and
the standard deviation is3.93728.This shows that the data
is normally distributed, where is the mean 4.3728> standard deviation is 3.93728.
The minimum net profit variable for BBTN companies in
2019 is 209,263, the maximum value for BBRI companies in 2019 is 34,400,000,
the mean is1.5049and
the standard deviation is1.02042. This shows that the
data is normally distributed, where is the mean1.5049> standard deviation1.02042.
1.
Classical Assumption Testing
a. Data Normality Test Normality test is conducted to test
whether the distribution of a data follows or approaches a normal distribution.
Figure 1 Normality Test Histogram
Source:
SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
Based
on Figure 1 above
by looking at the normality test histogram display above, it can be concluded
that the histogram shows a normal distribution pattern.
Figure 2. PP Plot Normality Test
Source:
SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0
Based on Figure 2 above, then for the results of testing the normality of
the data using the PP Plot image, it can be seen that the data points are
spread around the diagonal line so that the data is normally distributed.
To further ascertain whether the data along the diagonal
line is normally distributed or not, the Kolmogorov Smirnov test (1 Sample KS)
is performed by looking at the residual data whether the distribution is normal
or not. If the Asym.sig (2-tailed) value > significant level (α = 0.05) then
the residual data is normally distributed.
Table
7
Normality
Test One Sample Kolmogorov Smirnov Test
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test |
||
|
|
Unstandardized Residuals |
N |
36 |
|
Normal Parameters |
Means |
.0000000 |
std. Deviation |
3.78936795E6 |
|
Most Extreme Differences |
absolute |
.139 |
Positive |
072 |
|
Negative |
-.139 |
|
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z |
.831 |
|
asymp.
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.494 |
|
a. Test distribution is Normal. |
|
Source:
SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
In table 7 above, it can be seen that the
results of the data processing, the Kolmogrov Smirnov significance value is
0.494, so it can be concluded that the data is normally distributed, where the
significance value is greater than 0.05 (p = 0.494 > 0.05).
Thus, overall it can be concluded that
the data observation values have been normally distributed and can be
continued with other classical assumption tests.
b. Multicollinearity Test
Multicollinearity test was conducted to
see whether there is a linear relationship between the independent variables in
the regression model. The results of the multicollinearity test are described
in the following table:
Table 8
Multicollinearity
Test
Coefficientsa |
|
|||||||||||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
Collinearity Statistics |
|
|||||||||||
B |
std. Error |
tolerance |
VIF |
|
||||||||||||
1 |
(Constant) |
1,060 |
1,569 |
.676 |
.504 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest income |
.484 |
080 |
6,088 |
.000 |
.172 |
3,943 |
|
|||||||||
Interest expense |
-.045 |
.271 |
-2,382 |
.023 |
.172 |
3,943 |
|
|||||||||
a. Dependent Variable: Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Source:
SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
From
table 8 it can be seen that all independent variables are not affected by
multicollinearity problems. This can be seen from the VIF value < 10 and
Tolerance > 0.10. Interest income variable has a tolerance value of 0.172
and VIF of 3.943 Interest expense variable has a tolerance value of 0.172 and
VIF of 3.943.
c. Autocorrelation Test
The autocorrelation test aims to test
whether in the linear regression model there is a correlation between the
t-period confounding error and the period error (t-1) or earlier. Determining
whether there is autocorrelation can be used with a run test. Basic decision
making in the test run test, namely:
1)
If the Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
is less than 0.05, then there is a symptom of autocorrelation.
2)
If the Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
is greater than 0.05, then there are no symptoms of autocorrelation.
Table 9
Autocorrelation Test
Run Test |
|
|
Unstandardized
Residuals |
Value
test |
-2.41728E5 |
Cases
< Test Value |
18 |
Cases
>= Test Value |
18 |
Total
Cases |
36 |
Number
of Runs |
21 |
Z |
.507 |
asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.612 |
a.
Median |
|
Source: SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
Based
on table 9 above, it can be seen that the Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.612 >
0.05, so there is no autocorrelation.
2. Multiple Linear Regression
Multiple linear regression analysis was
performed to determine the effect of the independent variables namely interest
income and interest expenses on net income.
Table 10
Multiple Linear Regression
Coefficientsa |
|
|||||||||||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
Collinearity Statistics |
|
|||||||||||
B |
std. Error |
tolerance |
VIF |
|
||||||||||||
1 |
(Constant) |
1,060 |
1,569 |
.676 |
.504 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest income |
.484 |
080 |
6,088 |
.000 |
.172 |
3,943 |
|
|||||||||
Interest expense |
-.045 |
.271 |
-2,382 |
.023 |
.172 |
3,943 |
|
|||||||||
a.
Dependent Variable: Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Source: SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
Table
10 in the column unstandardized beta coefficients can be arranged multiple
linear regression equation as follows:
Y =1,060+0.484X1 – 0.645 X2
The
interpretation of the multiple linear regression equation is:
a. If
everything in the independent variables is considered absent, the net profit
(Y) is 1.060 million.
b. If
there is an increase in interest income (X1) of 1 million, then net profit (Y)
will increase by 0.484 million.
c.
If there is an increase in
interest expense (X1) of 1 million, then net profit (Y) will decrease by 0.045
million.
3. Hypothesis
testing
a.
Simultaneous
Significance Test (F Test)
The F test was conducted to find out how the independent
variable influences the dependent variable simultaneously.
Table 11
Simultaneous Test
ANOVA b |
||||||
Model |
Sum
of Squares |
df |
MeanSquare |
F |
Sig. |
|
1 |
Regression |
3.142 |
2 |
1,571 |
103,149 |
.000a |
residual |
5026 |
33 |
1,523 |
|
|
|
Total |
3,644 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
a.
Predictors: (Constant), Interest Expense, Interest Income |
|
|
||||
b.
Dependent Variable: Net Income |
|
|
|
Source:
SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
Based
on table 11 of the F test calculation, it can be seen that the Fcount value is
103.149 > Ftable 3.28, with a significance of 0.000 <0.05. This shows
that all the independent variables are interest income and interest expenses simultaneously has a significant effect on net
income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
b.
Partial
Significance Test (t test)
Partial test
(T test) is performed to determine whether
the independent variable is partially dependent on the dependent variable.
Table 12
Partial Test
Coefficientsa |
|
|||||||||||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
Collinearity Statistics |
|
|||||||||||
B |
std. Error |
tolerance |
VIF |
|
||||||||||||
1 |
(Constant) |
1,060 |
1,569 |
.676 |
.504 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest income |
.484 |
080 |
6,088 |
.000 |
.172 |
3,943 |
|
|||||||||
Interest expense |
-.045 |
.271 |
-2,382 |
.023 |
.172 |
3,943 |
|
|||||||||
a.
Dependent Variable: Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Source: SPSS
Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
Based on table 12 to
determine the effect of the independent variable interest income and interest
expense partially on the dependent variablenet profitis as
follows:
1) Interest income has tcount (6.088) > ttable (2.034)
and is significant 0.000 <0.05. This means that partially interest income
has a significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the
Indonesia Stock Exchange.
2) Interest expense has tcount (-2.382) > ttable (2.034)
and is significant 0.023 <0.05. This means that partially interest expense
has a significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the
Indonesia Stock Exchange.
c.
Coefficient
of Determination
The
coefficient of determination (Adjusted R Square) measures how far the model's
ability to explain variations in interest income and interest expense variables
on net income. The coefficient of determination is between 0 and 1. The
Adjusted R Square value which is close to one means that the independent
variables of the study provide almost all the information needed to predict
variations in net income variables. In this study Adjusted R Square was used,
because the independent variables used in this study were more than one. The
results of the coefficient of determination can be seen in table 13 as follows:
Table 13
Coefficient of Determination
Summary modelb |
|
|||||||||||
Model |
R |
R
Square |
Adjusted R Square |
std.
Error of the Estimate |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
1 |
.928a |
.862 |
.854 |
3.90251E6 |
|
|||||||
a. Predictors: (Constant), Interest
Expense, Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
b. Dependent Variable: Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Source:
SPSS Processing Results Version 16.0 (2021)
From table 13 the coefficient of determination above, it
can be seen that the Adjusted R Square value is 0.854. The result of this
statistical calculation means that the ability of the independent variable to
explain the variation in the changes in the dependent variable is 85.4%, while
the remaining 14.6% (100% - 85.4%) is explained by other factors outside the
analyzed regression model. Adjusted R Square value is 0.854, which means 85.4%
of the influence of the independent variables on the dependent variable can be
explained by the variables in this study and the rest is explained by other
variables not examined such as company size, liquidity, cash and others.
B. Discussion
1. Effect of Interest Income on
Net Income
Based
on data analysis and hypothesis testing that has been carried out in this
study, it can be seen that tcount (6.088) > ttable (2.034) and is
significant 0.000 <0.05. This means that partially interest income has a
significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange. The success of a company can be measured by the level of net
profit earned by the company itself because the main goal of the company in
general is to obtain the maximum net profit and the achievement of net profit
is a determining factor for the survival of the company itself. Net profit can
be obtained optimally, if the operating income received also achieves maximum
results. The effect of interest income on net income is if income exceeds expenses will get profit, otherwise if income
less than expenses will get a loss.
Increase net profit, must
be accompanied by an increase in revenue. If interest income increases and is
accompanied by an increase in net profit, the result is a very large profit for
a company. This can be seen from the net profit earned by a company, which
increases every year with changes in income. The results of this study are in
accordance with the research
(Mulyani, 2016; Pradopo, 2020; Ridwan, 2018)
show that interest income has a significant effect on net income.
2.
Effect
of Interest Expense on Net Income
Based
on data analysis and hypothesis testing that has been carried out in this
study, it can be seen that t count (-2.382) > t table (2.034) and is
significant 0.023 <0.05. This means that partially interest expense has a
significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange. The effect of interest expense on net income is that if banks
can reduce costs, then banks will be able to increase net income. And vice
versa, if there is a waste of costs (such as excessive use of office equipment)
it will result in a decrease in net profit. The effect of interest expense on
net income is in the calculation of profit and loss, the amount of this fee
will reduce profits or increase bank losses. Interest expense has a negative
effect on net income, meaning that the greater the interest expense incurred,
the smaller the net profit obtained and vice versa the smaller the interest
expense used, the greater the net profit obtained by the bank. The results of
this study are in accordance with the research of (Heryana, 2010; Pradopo, 2020)
indicating that interest expense has a significant effect on net income.
3. Effect of Interest Income and
Interest Expense on Net Income
Based
on data analysis and hypothesis testing that has been carried out in this
study, it can be seen that F count is 103.149 > F table 3.28, with a
significance of 0.000 < 0.05. This shows that all the independent variables
are interest income and interest expense simultaneously
has a significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on
the Indonesia Stock Exchange. If interest income increases and is accompanied
by an increase in net profit, the result is a very large profit for a company.
This can be seen from the net profit earned by a company, which increases every
year with changes in income. Interest expense has a negative effect on net
income, meaning that the greater the interest expense incurred, the smaller the
net profit obtained and vice versa, the smaller the interest expense used, the
greater the net profit obtained by the bank.
The results of this study
are in accordance with the research
Rono (Mulyani, 2016; Pradopo, 2020; Ridwan, 2018)
show that interest income and interest expenses have a significant effect on
net income.
CONCLUSION
Based
on the results of the data analysis that has been done, the conclusions that
can be drawn from this study are as follows; (1) interest income partially has a significant effect on net
income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange,
(2) interest expense partially has a
significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange, and (3) interest income and interest expenses simultaneously have
a significant effect on net income at state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta. Google Scholar
Baroroh, U. (2012). Analisis sektor keuangan terhadap
pertumbuhan ekonomi regional di wilayah Jawa: Pendekatan model levine. Etikonomi,
11(2). Google Scholar
Dyastuti, D. O. (2015). Analisis Sistem Pemberian Kredit
Modal Kerja Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Mendukung Pengendalian Intern Kredit
(Studi Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk Unit Pamekasan Kota).
Brawijaya University. Google Scholar
Fitriasari, F. (2017). Strategi Pengembangan Pembiayaan Usaha
Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah (UMKM) Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan.
Google Scholar
Heryana, T. (2010). Pengaruh Biaya Bunga Terhadap Pendapatan
Bunga Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Likuiditas Pada PT. Bank Jabar Banten. Aset,
387. Google Scholar
Ichsan, N. (2014). Pengantar perbankan. Referensi
(Gaung Persada Press Group). Google Scholar
Mulyani, H. (2016). Pengaruh Pendapatan Bunga Terhadap Profitabilitas
Pada PT. Bank Jabar Banten. JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Dan Keuangan,
4(2), 44–53. Google Scholar
Pradopo, L. R. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Pendapatan Bunga
Kredit Dan Biaya Bunga Dana Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Laba Bersih Pada Bank Ocbc
Nisp Periode 2012-2018. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Jayakarta, 2(1),
24–37. Google Scholar
Rahmadhani, L., & Mawardi, W. (2011). Analisis
Pengaruh CAR, Pertumbuhan DPK, Pertumbuhan Simpanan dari Bank Lain dan Suku
Bunga SBI terhadap Pertumbuhan Kredit (Studi Kasus pada Bank Umum Konvensional
yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2006-2010). Universitas Diponegoro. Google Scholar
Ridwan, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pendapatan Bunga Kredit
Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perusahaan Jasa Sektor Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di
Bursa Efek Indonesia. Ekonomi. Google Scholar
Salam, A. (2018). Inklusi Keuangan Perbankan Syariah Berbasis
Digital-Banking: Optimalisasi dan Tantangan. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan
Perbankan Syari’ah, 10(1), 63–80. Google Scholar
Sujarweni, V. W. (2015). Metodologi penelitian bisnis dan
ekonomi. Google Scholar
Suliyanto, P. (2018). Metode Penelitian Bisnis untuk
Skripsi, Tesis & Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher. Google Scholar
Werner, R. A. (2014). Can banks individually create money out
of nothing?—The theories and the empirical evidence. International Review of
Financial Analysis, 36, 1–19. Elsevier
Wiwoho, J. (2014). Peran lembaga keuangan bank dan lembaga
keuangan bukan bank dalam memberikan Distribusi keadilan bagi masyarakat. Masalah-Masalah
Hukum, 43(1), 87–97. Google Scholar
© 2022 by
the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).