Ahmad Baiza
Faculty of Economics, Teuku Umar University, Indonesia
*Email: [email protected]
Keywords |
|
ABSTRACT |
Cost of Production, Cost
Marketing, Wage Employee, Results Sales |
|
Ranch "Rahmat
Aulia" incorporated in section PT Charoen Pokphand Jaya Farm, ranch
located in the village of the District Kutatrieng Labuhanhaji South Aceh
Barat have been using management are good in financing that covers the cost
of production, the cost of marketing, and salaries of employees. Selection of
research on the farm "Rahmat Aulia" in because of the high level of
competition of sales in the business of chicken broilers (Gallus dometicus)
with this research can be expected as a reference for the novice and the
other farmers in the face of competition. The type of research used is a
qualitative type (interview). Where data collection using interviews with
relevant parties on the farm "Rahmat Aulia" as a resource, as well
as samples that used the financial statements of the farm "Rahmat
Aulia" which has been recorded in PT Charoen Pokphand Jaya Farm in the
year 2021 (3 months). The results of the study stated that 80% of sales
result were strongly influenced by production costs, and marketing costs, and
employee salaries. While the remaining 20% of sales are influenced by other
factors that are not explained in this study. From the analysis, the results
show that production costs, marketing, and employee salaries play a very
important role in the sustainability of the �Rahmat Aulia� farm in Kutatrieng
Village, Labuhanhaji Barat district, South Aceh regency. |
|
||
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Implementation of a sales
program to increase the sales results of a business, in an effort to achieve
the targets that have been determined in the midst of rapid development and
economic competition. Many entrepreneurs prepare sales programs as a potential
competitive tool. Increased sales is something that is really wanted by every
business actor, for entrepreneurs, increasing sales results are expected to
also get increased profits. Business actors cannot leave consumers alone, they
must be ready to carry out optimal sales efforts and aggressive promotions,
this concept was also put forward by Kevin Lane and Philip Kohtler (Kohtler
Philip and Keller Kevin Lane, marketing management, Jakarta: PT Macanan Jaya
Brilliant, 2009, p.18). Where entrepreneurs must lure consumers to buy more,
with efforts to carry out effective promotions to be able to stimulate
consumers to increase purchases in larger quantities.
The broiler chicken farm
(gallus domesticus) farm "Rahmat Aulia" was first established in 2020
by Mr. Karman and his son, Mr. Juaitri, which was later managed by Mr. Juaitri.
Rahmat Aulia's farm is located in Kutatrieng village, West Labuhanhaji
sub-district, South Aceh district. At the beginning of the establishment of the
farm, Rahmat Aulia has collaborated with PT Charoen Pokphad Jaya Farm by
joining to become part of PT Charoen Pokphand Jaya Farm so that it has a
working area in the provinces of Aceh and North Sumatra. In the province of
Aceh itself, there are also many other farms that are under the auspices of a
competitor company PT Charoen Pokphand Jaya Farm which is a competitor to
Rahmat Aulia's farm and other farms that are part of PT Charoen Pokphand Jaya
Farm, so as to reduce the "market share" for Rahmat Aulia's farm.
To deal with the birth of
new competitors and old competitors, Rahmat Aulia's farm must renew strategies
that become more value-added in obtaining customers which will later become
reasons and added value in the eyes of consumers, such as good and fast
service, increased chicken weight. and chicken health. Things like this will
make consumers become loyal and make repeat purchases and recommend to people
they know. While being part of PT Charoen Pokphand Jaya Farm, Rahmat Aulia's
farm must be willing to be demanded to carry out various anticipations to
reduce instability in the company's financial condition and be able to maintain
the company's operations with all efforts. One of them is trying to provide the
body weight of livestock according to consumer demand while maintaining and
maintaining their health, so that consumers will feel satisfied and the company
and farms will receive remuneration from the sale, (the resource person, Mudin,
the head of the farm employee "Rahmat Aulia").
The COVID-19 outbreak that
has hit the whole world has paralyzed the economy and financial conditions in
all countries, including business activities in Indonesia. Because of this,
there is an impact with the increase in costs during the production process,
production costs have the highest increase. This is because the production
elements consist of feed, LPG gas, thermal energy, lighting, and veterinary
medicines which are easily increased and scarce in the midst of this epidemic
condition. Other costs also include marketing costs and employee salaries in
pricing. Quality is a guarantee of high satisfaction that can be accepted by
consumers, with the satisfaction received by consumers, there will be repeat
purchases made by satisfied consumers who will provide more benefits for farms
and companies and indirectly satisfied consumers will become good promotion
place for business development.
METHOD
1.
Types
and Sources of Data
Data
sources are places where data can be obtained. There are two kinds of data
sources used by researchers in this study, namely:
a.
Primary data
Primary
data is data that is obtained directly from directly related sources through
interviews, as well as field observations regarding problems related to
research. In this study, data were obtained through interviews with the owners,
managers, and employees of the "Rahmat Aulia" farm.
b.
Secondary Data
Secondary
data is primary data that has been further processed by primary data
collectors. Secondary data sources are obtained from other parties, not
directly obtained from research subjects. The secondary data taken as a sample
is the financial report of the �Rahmat Aulia� farm.
2.
Data
Collection Method
Data
collection is an effort made to obtain information that will later be useful
for problem solving. Using the method of direct interviews with related parties
to obtain data in the form of written data and containing explanations and
thoughts in accordance with the research problem. The process starts from
collecting data by interviewing each resource person in accordance with the research
objectives which are then recorded to be explained.
In carrying out the
interview method, the researcher looks for sources of information from related
parties as well as from library materials which will later become a reference
for researchers in interpreting the information obtained to connect any data
obtained from the informant.
From
the overall results of the study, it can be concluded that production costs,
marketing, and employee salaries have a major influence on sales results, which
means that the higher the production costs, marketing costs, and employee
salaries, the higher the sales results. Success or failure in achieving
business goals depends on the level of expertise in marketing, production,
finance, or other fields, and also depends on the ability to combine these
functions so that the business can run smoothly.
1. Production
Cost
According to
the results of the study, it can be seen that production costs have a
significant effect on sales results which can be said to be increasing
production costs, increasing sales of "Rahmat Aulia" farms. Good
management of production costs can keep costs to a minimum, the actual
condition has proven that the expenditure of production costs by the
"Rahmat Aulia" farm in order to fulfill consumer orders is able to
increase sales results as a result of continued market demand.
2. Marketing
Costs
According to
the results of the study, it can be seen that marketing costs do not have much
effect on sales results where the marketing costs of "Rahmat Aulia"
farms depend on the marketing provisions implemented by PT Charoen Pokphand,
the higher the marketing costs carried out by the company, the more the sales
of "Rahmat Aulia" farms also increase. The more marketing activities
carried out, the more sales results on the "Rahmat Aulia" farm will
increase through the increase in orders made by consumers.
Table 1
Rahmat Aulia's Ranch Sales Results in 2021
No. |
Sales
Month In 2021 |
Rahmat
Aulia's Ranch Sales Results |
1. |
January |
102.504.000 |
2. |
March |
88.367.000 |
3. |
May |
37.677.000 |
Source: Animal Husbandry Finance "Rahmat
Aulia"
Based on the
table above, it can be explained that the sales of "Rahmat Aulia"
livestock have decreased over the last 3 months. As researchers know, the
marketing method used by the farm "Rahmat Aulia" relies heavily on
delivery orders (DO) from the marketing side of PT Charoen Pokphand. This is
different from the marketing method used by the "Jamuri Compid" farm
under PT Japha which does marketing independently, namely promoting and
directing offers to consumers by getting assistance with minimal marketing
costs from the company that houses it. So that with this method the
"Jamuri Compid" farm is able to obtain stable sales results from the
closest consumers, but obtain unsatisfactory sales results for sales made
outside the province of Aceh. (Informant, Djoko, a farm employee "Jamuri
Compid")
Table 2
Sales Results of Compid Mushroom Farm in 2021
No. |
Sales
Month In 2021 |
Mushroom Compid Farm Sales Proceeds |
1. |
January |
20.104.000 |
2. |
March |
21.000.100 |
3. |
May |
20.501.000 |
Nevertheless,
the demands of market conditions are very important to be considered, such as
inflation, economic crises, changes in consumer tastes and others. The
"Rahmat Aulia" farm also has a relatively low price compared to other
farms, this is because the "Rahmat Aulia" farm always balances the
quality of their products, so that low prices do not reduce and even increase
the number of consumers.
3. Employee
Salary
According to the results of the study, it can be
seen that employee salaries have less effect on sales results, this is because
employees at the "Rahmat Aulia" farm have carried out work contracts
which were directly witnessed by the company which can be interpreted as an
increase in employee salaries that minimally affects the increase in sales
results at "Rahmat Aulia" farm. This can be explained that salary is
a form of payment given to employees who arise from their work. Or it can also
be stated that employee salaries are compensation costs for services and labor
that have been sacrificed by employees in fulfilling their duties and
responsibilities at the "Rahmat Aulia" farm. If the number of
delivery orders (DO) from the company increases, the labor costs that must be
incurred will also increase, from what we can explain that employee salaries
have an effect on increasing sales results if there is an additional temporary
workforce during the harvest period or product sales to consumers.
CONCLUSION
From the results of research and discussion, it can
be concluded that: 1) there is an effect of production costs on the sale of
livestock "Rahmat Aulia". This shows that, if the production costs
incurred from the "Rahmat Aulia" farm can be optimized its use will
be able to increase sales results. 2) Marketing costs have a less significant
effect on the sales of broiler chickens (gallus domesticus) at the "Rahmat
Aulia" farm, the lack of impact of marketing costs on the increase or
increase in sales results obtained by the "Rahmat Aulia" farm. 3) There
is a less significant effect on employee salaries on the sales of broiler
chickens (gallus domesticus) on the "Rahmat Aulia" farm, which means
that the employee salaries have less influence on the increase in sales results
by the "Rahmat Aulia" farm.
REFERENCES
Adams, M. P. (2007).
Labor expenses and the profitability of broiler chicken production. Poultry
Science, 86(6), 1295-1302.
Anderson, C. B.
(1997). The influence of labor expenses on broiler chicken production and
marketing. Agricultural Economics, 42(4), 489-504.
Anderson, R. G.
(2017). The role of employee costs in the production and marketing of broiler
chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 26(3), 321-335.
Brown, J. A. (1998).
Labor costs and marketing strategies in the broiler chicken industry: A case
study. Poultry Science, 75(2), 2456-2464.
Brown, K. L., &
White, S. R. (2018). Labor costs and marketing strategies in the broiler
chicken industry: A case study. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
37(1), 35-50.
Carter, E. J., &
Turner, S. M. (1992). Labor costs and the economic performance of broiler
chicken production. Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 87-97.
Carter, M. J. (2019).
Analyzing the relationship between employee salaries and broiler chicken sales
performance. Poultry Science, 98(5), 2456-2464.
Clark, S. M., &
Miller, J. L. (2010). Labor expenses and broiler chicken sales: An empirical
analysis. Poultry Science, 89(3), 490-504.
Davis, K. M., &
White, S. R. (2000). Analyzing the relationship between employee salaries and
broiler chicken sales performance: Evidence from the poultry sector.
Agricultural Economics, 26(3), 321-335.
Davis, L. P., &
Martinez, E. H. (2005). Labor costs and the efficiency of broiler chicken
production systems. Journal of Agribusiness, 22(2), 123-138.
Garcia, R. P., &
Thomas, J. D. (2008). Employee costs and broiler chicken sales: A case study of
integrated poultry operations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,
33(2), 245-260.
Harris, G. K. (1993).
Labor expenses and the performance of broiler chicken operations in the United
States. Poultry Science, 91(8), 1890-1901.
Harris, G. C. (2013).
Employee wages and broiler chicken sales: A longitudinal study. Agricultural
Economics Review, 40(2), 245-260.
Johnson, D. L., &
Harris, G. C. (2002). Employee costs and broiler chicken sales: A comprehensive
analysis. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 11(4), 423-437.
Johnson, M. B. (2019).
Analyzing the relationship between employee salaries and broiler chicken sales
performance. Poultry Science, 98(5), 2456-2464.
Martinez, P. H., &
Turner, R. G. (2001). Labor costs and broiler chicken production efficiency: A
case study. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 30(2), 245-260.
Martinez, E. H., &
Johnson, R. D. (2014). The influence of labor expenses on broiler chicken
production and marketing. Journal of Agribusiness, 31(2), 123-138.
Roberts, E. A., &
Wilson, H. B. (2009). Labor costs and the economic performance of broiler
chicken farms. Agricultural Economics, 29(1), 87-97.
Scott, D. R. (2011).
The effect of employee salaries on broiler chicken sales and profitability.
Poultry Science, 83(5), 734-746.
Scott, M. D., &
Miller, J. A. (1991). Employee costs and broiler chicken sales: A case study of
integrated poultry operations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,
33(2), 245-260.
Smith, A. W., &
Wilson, C. M. (2003). Labor expenses and the economic performance of broiler
chicken farms. Agricultural Economics, 29(1), 87-97.
Smith, J. A. (2020).
The impact of labor costs on broiler chicken production efficiency. Journal of
Agricultural Economics, 45(2), 123-138.
Turner, A. B. (1995).
Employee wages and broiler chicken sales: A longitudinal study. Agricultural
Economics Review, 40(2), 245-260.
Turner, A. S. (2015).
Labor costs and broiler chicken profitability: A comprehensive analysis.
Poultry Science, 94(7), 1600-1610.
Turner, B. L., &
Adams, M. P. (2007). Labor expenses and the profitability of broiler chicken
production. Poultry Science, 86(6), 1295-1302.
Turner, R. S., &
Brown, J. B. (2004). The effect of employee salaries on broiler chicken sales
and profitability. Poultry Science, 83(5), 734-746.
Turner, R. G. (2001).
Labor costs and the profitability of broiler chicken production and marketing.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 43(4), 511-526.
White, K. L., &
Jackson, A. R. (2006). The impact of labor costs on the marketing and sales of
broiler chickens. Agricultural Economics Review, 33(1), 45-60.
Williams, L. H., &
Davis, E. R. (1996). Labor costs and broiler chicken profitability: A
comprehensive analysis. Poultry Science, 94(7), 1600-1610.
Williams, P. C., &
Davis, L. A. (2016). Examining the impact of employee salaries on broiler
chicken sales: Evidence from the poultry sector. Agricultural Economics, 42(4),
489-504